Weekend link dump for November 16

“How a flock of Canadian ostriches became a favorite MAHA cause”.

“My inland neighbors and Republicans across the county should take Prop 50 as a wake-up call. If voters want their ballots to count under fairly drawn maps, there’s a decades-old fight they can join. Unfortunately, their party has been the villain of that story so far. I would say it’s never too late to do the right thing, but—given the year our democracy has had—I’ll stick with it’s not too late yet. We can still call a ceasefire, name fairness a bipartisan virtue, and let voters pick their politicians. We can still get out of this mess.”

“Researchers at the Cooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations (CIWRO) at the University of Oklahoma are shedding new light on derechos — rare, rapid-moving windstorms capable of causing extensive damage across hundreds of miles.” Everyone in Houston looks forward to hearing more about this.

“Seven Reasons Listicles Didn’t Suck, Actually (And One Of Them May Surprise You)”.

“This return represents more than the restoration of land — it is the restoration of balance, dignity, and our sacred connection to the places our ancestors once walked. The Franciscan Sisters’ act of generosity and courage stands as an example of what true healing and partnership can look like. We are proud to welcome Marywood home, to ensure it continues to serve future generations of the Lac du Flambeau people.”

RIP, Lenny Wilkens, basketball Hall of Famer as a player and as a coach, who also won two Olympic gold medals as the Team USA coach.

“I have been on two humanitarian-esque missions with the guard, which were awesome, doing the things you see on the commercial, helping these communities. “And then you want me to go pick up trash and dissuade homeless people in D.C. at gunpoint. Like, no dude. It’s so disheartening every time I see another city — and I just wonder, ‘who’s going to stand up to this?'”

“As the government relaxes efficiency targets, progress will stall and car buyers will get stuck with cars that cost more to operate.”

“TikTok users have decided that November is the month for memes about the Edmund Fitzgerald“.

“How much easier to say that you think women are not that smart, or that we’re rather bad people, than to admit that male dominance suited you and that you’ll really miss it. And those who’ll miss it, unfortunately, include certain women. Women like Helen Andrews like to cozy up to male power in order to enjoy a shred of it, to bask in the pallid light of conservative male approval. I am sure they often don’t know why they’re doing it. That doesn’t make it any better.”

“Guardians’ Emmanuel Clase, Luis Ortiz indicted on charges linked to illegal sports betting”. See evidence of the charges here. As Michael Buamann says, this is “a breach of public trust and a blow to Major League Baseball’s credibility.”

This show was made by humans“. As was and is this blog, and this linkdump.

“The U.S. government is reportedly preparing to ban the sale of wireless routers and other networking gear from TP-Link Systems, a tech company that currently enjoys an estimated 50% market share among home users and small businesses. Experts say while the proposed ban may have more to do with TP-Link’s ties to China than any specific technical threats, much of the rest of the industry serving this market also sources hardware from China and ships products that are insecure fresh out of the box.”

RIP, Sally Kirkland, Oscar-nominate actor known for The Way We Were, The Sting, and A Star Is Born, among others.

RIP, Estine Davis, pioneering El Paso businesswoman, founder of the Miss Black El Paso Pageant, upcoming inductee to the El Paso Black Hall of Fame, and quite the character as documented in this obituary.

RIP, Cleo Hearn, founder of Cowboys of Color Rodeo, member of the Texas Black Sports Hall of Fame and the National Cowboy Museum and Hall of Fame.

“I think of it as: You live in a disaster zone. The floods and hurricanes are going to be twice as strong and three times as frequent going forward. So you’ve got to retrofit the house (this means legislation, mostly) and get in the habit of handling natural disasters (this means their approach to power). So what counts in this context? Here are five things I would want to ask and get an answer on from every Democratic senator or candidate. Think of it another way: You’re new management coming in to turn around a failing company. You want to sit down with every employee right after you take over to see if they’re part of the solution or part of the problem. That’s the Status Interview. Here are the five questions.”

“The most obvious reform that would make sports betting a bit safer is to federally ban credit card deposits for gambling accounts. The next most obvious thing would be to acknowledge that even a libertarian approach to sports betting does not mean people need to be allowed to bet on a specific pitch in an AL Central game in June.”

RIP, Cleto Escobedo III, musician and bandleader for Jimmy Kimmel Live!.

RIP, Michael Ray Richardson, four-time NBA All Star who was banned by the league (and then later reinstated, though he played in Europe after that) for violations of their drug policy.

“i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump.”

“The Secret History of Santacon, America’s Most Hated Christmas Party”.

“But I’m not sure those writers fully appreciate that they’ve written an accurate summary not just of this one weird individual, but of the overwhelming character of white evangelical discipleship and white evangelical devotion, practice, hermeneutics, orthodoxy, orthopraxy, spirituality, piety, ethics, and soteriology.”

“Three original paintings by Bob Ross were auctioned Tuesday for more than $600,000 combined as part of a series to help raise money for public broadcasting after the Trump administration cut funding.”

“You simply cannot create a culture or a party of wholesale male entitlement and not wind up with women and girls paying the price — being the ones whose bodies, livelihoods, and lives those men feel entitled to.”

RIP, Dave Burgess, singer, songwriter, guitarist for The Champs, whose best known song by far is “Tequila”.

“If you come across anyone who really wants to make AI Dead Loved Ones, please tell them forcefully that humanity has its back against the wall and however the battle goes we will remember the names of our deserters. We must recognize what’s sane and insane if we are to have any hope of pulling out of this tailspin.”

RIP, Todd Snider, alt-country singer/songwriter.

RIP, John Beam, athletic director and former football coach at Laney College in Oakland, Calif. who gained national prominence for his appearance in Netflix’s docuseries “Last Chance U”.

RIP, Kenny Easley, Hall of Fame safety for the Seattle Seahawks.

RIP, Brigitte Friedmann Altman, Holocaust survivor, linguist, translator, unofficial welcoming committee for Fort Worth’s arts scene. Damn, we lost some amazing people this week.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 2 Comments

There are four lawsuits against Camp Mystic

Updating the count.

The Houston family of 9-year-old Ellen Getten, who died when floodwaters overwhelmed Camp Mystic on July 4, is suing the private Christian girls’ summer camp, saying it and its operators are guilty of “gross negligence.”

Their lawsuit, filed Monday in Travis County, joins at least three others filed by grieving families, who are pushing to hold the camp and its leaders accountable for ignored warnings and inadequate safety plans. Ellen was among 27 campers and counselors who died at Camp Mystic.

“We filed the lawsuit because we don’t want any other family to go through this again,” said Ellen’s mother, Jennifer Getten. “We want transparency. We want accountability of what happened.”

[…]

The lawsuit detailed Camp Mystic’s cabins are in or near the 100-year floodplain and the camp has faced floods as far back as 1932. The camp flooded in 1978 when more than 100 campers had to be relocated during the night, and in 1984 flooding blocked roads, and one of the camp’s owners had to be lifted out via helicopter for medical care.

The plaintiffs alleged that instead of relocating cabins — some of them known to be in the river’s floodway — Camp Mystic expanded six years ago in a flood-risk area with a $5 million construction project. The camp allegedly sought to “hide this risk” by appealing to the federal government to have the “‘100-year floodplain’ designation removed from dozens of buildings.” That designation required the camp to have flood insurance and navigate tighter regulations on future construction, according to the filing.

“So, not only would the removal of this designation allow the Defendants to promulgate the falsity that the facilities were ‘safe’ from a known flood risk, but the de-designation would also allow Camp Mystic to either avoid flood insurance requirements, lower its insurance premiums, or not be faced with more stringent regulations on future construction,” the lawsuit says. “Said another way, the Defendants decided to put money and profits over the lives of children and transparency to parents and the public.”

Attorney Mikal Watts, representing Camp Mystic, alleged that the federal maps were “outdated” and that “cabins were not in the floodplain.” He alleged that maps were updated in 2013, and cabins were taken off the map.

See here for the background. The Chron story that post is based on, which only listed two lawsuits at the time I wrote the post, now names four: The Peck family lawsuit, the Getten family lawsuit, and two multi-family lawsuits; the Peck family lawsuit and one of the multi-family lawsuits were in the original version of the story. That’s still a gift link, so go read it or read it again if you’re catching up.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Whooping cough hits a new high

Thanks, anti-vaxxers! Couldn’t have done this without you.

More than 3,500 cases of pertussis, or whooping cough, cases have been reported in Texas so far this year, already reaching a 11-year high even though two more highly infectious months are left in the year, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services.

The uptick in whooping cough, which is especially contagious in children, has coincided with a decline in vaccination rates for the illness, according to disease experts who urge the best way to control the spread is to get vaccinated. They also say whooping cough tends to spike every few years and that there isn’t a way to completely wipe out the disease.

“We practitioners and public health professionals are concerned because we are seeing a year-after-year trend of a significant increase in cases when this is preventable,” said Hector Ocaranza, a pediatrician and member of the Texas Medical Association’s Council on Science and Health Promotion. “Especially a disease that can have such a severe effect on infants, older people, and those who have chronic conditions.”

The Texas Department of State Health Services reported more than 3,500 cases of whooping cough through October, quadruple the number of cases during the same period last year, which saw a total of 1,907 cases, according to provisional data. The total so far is also 10 times the number of cases for all of 2023. This is the second consecutive year the state’s health agency has had to issue a health alert.

The agency’s most recent alert, published Nov. 3, noted that more than half of last year’s cases occurred in November and December, suggesting whooping cough cases will continue to climb.

Jason Bowling, professor and infectious disease specialist at UT Health San Antonio, the academic health center of The University of Texas at San Antonio, said this spike is aligning with the holiday season, further increasing the risk of whooping cough spreading.

“Oftentimes parents with a newborn infant don’t feel comfortable telling people to wash their hands or not to visit if they have a cough during the holidays, but they need to feel empowered and comfortable to do that right now,” he said.

[…]

The recent rise in whooping cough in Texas follows a national trend. In 2024, there were more than 35,000 documented cases, a significant jump from 7,063 in 2023. Two babies have died from the disease in Louisiana this year, as well as a child in South Dakota and an adult in Idaho.

Preliminary data from the Texas health agency indicate that approximately 85% of whooping cough cases in Texas this year have occurred in children, but no deaths have been reported.

Not yet, anyway. See here, here, and here for the background. As noted before, this is as predictable as humidity in July. We’ll be able to write a similar version of this story every reporting period from here until who knows when. Remember who brought this to you and why.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Rice Gateway Project

Looks cool.

Rice University is launching a massive $120 million project to renovate its historic Rice Stadium and to connect the west side of campus to Rice Village with a new pedestrian walkway.

The so-called “Gateway Project” is expected to transform unused property already owned by Rice, creating a park-like space for fans at the stadium plus easier access between the oak-lined campus and the Rice-owned shopping area. The project will also open up several extra blocks for retail and green space at Rice Village.

The stadium renovation will start after the 2026 season, and the Owls should be able to play most home games through the construction in 2027. The project is expected to stretch into 2028.

“This is a generational investment in the growth and vitality of Rice University,” said Robert T. Ladd, chairman of the Rice Board of Trustees. “By physically linking our university to one of Houston’s most dynamic neighborhoods and modernizing a cornerstone of our athletics district, we are honoring Rice’s legacy while paving the way for future growth, connectivity and impact.”

For more than a decade, university leaders and boosters have debated what to do with the stadium — a landmark that former athletic director Joe Karlgaard once called an “albatross.” It is one of Houston’s most storied event spaces, having hosted Super Bowl VIII and President John F. Kennedy’s historic “We choose to go to the moon” speech in 1962.

But Rice has struggled to fill the stadium consistently, and at times, university officials have battled a perception of neglecting Rice’s athletics program. The university has created more energy around its sports teams lately, especially with Rice joining the American Athletic Conference in 2023. Recent improvements to Rice Stadium added the $33 million Brian Patterson Sports Performance Center in the south end zone, cutting capacity from 70,000 to 47,000 seats.

While the revamp of Rice Stadium will keep elements of its 1950 design on the east side and in the lower bowl, other changes will modernize the stadium, keeping up with trends across college athletics. Rice officials hope to host more non-football events at the stadium, while game-time capacity will reduce to 30,000 seats — meaning fans can expect a louder, more intimate crowd as they cheer on the Owls.

[…]

In addition to the stadium facelift, Rice will develop a new corridor to link campus with the pedestrian-friendly Rice Village. The corridor will extend Amherst Avenue two blocks east from Morningside Drive, through Chaucer Drive, until it reaches campus with a new entrance on Greenbriar Drive. It’s mostly an unused parking lot currently.

The new road will expand the physical footprint of Rice Village. Officials with Rice Real Estate Co. say they hope to attract retail, multifamily housing and a grocery store along the street, which will also be walkable for students. Plans call for a public lawn for performances and community events.

At Greenbriar, the road will turn into a pedestrian-only walkway with trees, lighting and green space, taking students from the edge of Rice Village to Rice Stadium. Crews will install new drainage, sewage and water lines as part of the project.

“Rice Village has always been an important part of Rice,” University President Reginald DesRoches said. “Connecting it more to the Village is going to be better for Rice and certainly better for the surrounding community. We welcome them to come and give their thoughts and be part of this process.”

It’s a long story with a lot of detail and a bunch of conceptual photos of what the finished product should look like, so go read the rest. My first reaction was “But where will they have Beer Bike”, because that greenway is going right through where the bike track is now. I’m sure someone has thought of that. My second reaction is that this is a huge change for Rice, not just struBiutcturally but philosophically. When I arrived as a grad student in 1988, Rice divided the world into “inside the hedges” – i.e., on campus – and “outside the hedges”, literally everywhere else. This is bridging the two in a way that I’m sure would have been foreign to earlier generations of Owls.

And I think that’s great, for a couple of reasons. One, as noted it looks really appealing, and should be a terrific amenity for the Rice community and also for its close neighbors to the west. Two, it sure seems like a good time for universities everywhere to better integrate themselves with their surroundings, to make themselves a part of their larger communities and give them a sense that these oddball little places have something for them as well. When in “us versus them” times, investing in being part of a larger “us” makes sense.

The benefit for people who attend Rice football games is obvious, but that’s a small population even in the best times – there’s only a half dozen or so games a year. But if the stadium and now the attached Greenway space can attract more events, big and not so big, that’s a whole lot more people that will enjoy it. I can imagine this even working out well for the Shepherd School and its performance calendar – that building is on the east side of the stadium, which if connected via a pedestrian path from the new Gateway area would make it accessible to people in the Rice Village who don’t mind a bit of a hike to see some high-end music. That might be beyond their scope, but my point is that with a bit more vision there’s a lot of possibility here. I look forward to seeing what it turns into. CultureMap has more.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Trump Justice Department joins lawsuit against California redistricting

I suppose this was inevitable.

Gov. Gavin Newsom

The Justice Department on Thursday sued to block new congressional district boundaries approved by California voters last week, joining a court battle that could help determine which party wins control of the U.S. House in 2026.

The complaint filed in California federal court targets the new congressional map pushed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in response to a similar Republican-led effort in Texas backed by President Donald Trump. It sets the stage for a high-stakes legal and political fight between the Republican administration and the Democratic governor, who’s seen as a likely 2028 presidential contender.

“California’s redistricting scheme is a brazen power grab that tramples on civil rights and mocks the democratic process,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in an emailed statement. “Governor Newsom’s attempt to entrench one-party rule and silence millions of Californians will not stand.”

Newsom spokesperson Brandon Richards said in a statement, “These losers lost at the ballot box and soon they will also lose in court.”

The legal move against heavily Democratic California marks the first time the Justice Department has sued over a flurry of unusual, mid-decade House map revisions across the country that were drawn to maximize partisan advantage in advance of next year’s elections.

[…]

The Justice Department is joining a case challenging the new map that was brought by the California Republican Party last week. The Trump administration accuses California of racial gerrymandering in violation of the Constitution by using race as a factor to favor Hispanic voters with the new map. It asks a judge to prohibit California from using the new map in any future elections.

“Race cannot be used as a proxy to advance political interests, but that is precisely what the California General Assembly did with Proposition 50 — the recent ballot initiative that junked California’s pre-existing electoral map in favor of a rush-job rejiggering of California’s congressional district lines,” the lawsuit says.

I only noted the filing of the original lawsuit in last week’s Sunday linkdump, because I didn’t take any of it seriously. I still don’t – the whole thing is ludicrous, given how few actual rules apply to the drawing of political maps these days – but the stakes have been raised. But to focus again on the ridiculousness of it all, here’s Daily Kos with another angle.

As a bonus, California Republicans had even hired the Dhillon Law Group to handle their suit! Yes, as in the firm founded by Harmeet Dhillon, who now heads the Civil Rights Division at the DOJ—a gig she got because of her zeal to suppress votes.

Well, not white votes. Or Republican votes.

The DOJ’s motion to intervene makes sure to note that Dhillon is recused. Even this DOJ knows a court might take issue with that. But forgive us if we don’t take too seriously the notion that Dhillon would be entirely walled off from this suit. This is not a DOJ known for its ethical behavior. Rather, it’s a retribution machine run by people who will give President Donald Trump anything he wants.

The allegations in the California GOP’s complaint—and the reason for the zeal with which the DOJ hopped in—boil down to this: When California mapmakers discussed drawing districts, they discussed complying with the Voting Rights Act and creating Latino-majority districts. Therefore, it violates the 14th and 15th amendments as a racial gerrymander.

Would it surprise you to know that any allegations about this are vague at best? As Matt Barreto, a Democratic pollster who teaches political science at the University of California, Los Angeles, put it, “This Republican lawsuit is saying just because you said the word ‘Latino’ or the word ‘Asian,’ your map should be thrown out.”

Unfortunately, we’re all aware that for both the DOJ and the Supreme Court’s conservative majority, even the sketchiest invocation of race may be enough.

Never overlook the grift possibilities, these guys are always open for business. We’ll just have to see how this plays out. NBC News and a bunch of others have more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Ron Nirenberg to run for Bexar County Judge

Noted for the record.

Ron Nirenberg

San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg has filed paperwork to run for Bexar County Judge, all but confirming the nature of a “big announcement” he plans to make this Saturday.

Speculation has swirled in recent weeks that Nirenberg will challenge first-term Bexar County Judge Peter Sakai in the Democratic primary. Now, paperwork filed this week showing the former mayor has selected a campaign treasurer shows the talk is more than wild speculation.

The document names Nirenberg’s treasurer as personal injury attorney Jorge Herrera, and it lists the office he’s seeking as “Bexar County Judge.”

Nirenberg served as San Antonio mayor from 2017 to 2025 and was prohibited from running again due to term limits.

Political observers began chattering as early as this summer that Nirenberg was weighing a run for governor or another state-level office. However, his ambitions — at least for now — appear to lie closer to home.

See here for some background. That post was written before Gina Hinojosa (and Andrew White, and Chris Bell) had jumped into the Governor’s race, when I was definitely pulling for Nirenberg to go big. He decided not to, and the field has grown and improved since then. So, while I still think he should have gone big, here we are.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tesla robotaxis are coming to Houston

Eventually. Real Soon Now. When Elon gets around to it.

Tesla plans to bring its driverless robotaxi service to Houston, following CEO Elon Musk’s announcement that safety drivers will be phased out in Austin by the end of 2025.

Musk spoke at the annual Tesla shareholder meeting last week in Austin about the production of the robotaxi, which the company calls a “Cybercab.” As he spoke, a video noted the cities where Tesla plans to offer the driverless cab service: Houston, Dallas, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Miami. It is unclear when those areas will see the robotaxis.

“(The robotaxis) will be everywhere in the future,” Musk said during his announcement, which was reported by the Houston Business Journal.

Tesla currently has robotaxis in Austin and the San Francisco Bay Area. Last year, Musk specified that the services would be launched in California and Texas. In a July earnings call, he announced plans to release robotaxis in San Antonio and Los Angeles as well.

The robotaxis in Austin are the Model Y, one of the few models in the company’s production. The self-driving vehicle is an artificial intelligence-powered model featuring a sleek, futuristic exterior.

“We wanted it to look futuristic … it changes the look of the roads,” Musk said.

Tesla’s latest expansion in Austin offers 30 robotaxis in a 240-square-mile area, according to the Austin American-Statesman. The vehicles still have a human safety driver on board.

[…]

Even though Tesla plans to remove safety drivers from the vehicles in Austin, critics believe the self-driving system still requires a driver’s full attention. In Texas, a law currently allows self-driving cars to operate on public roads without a driver. However, a new state rule requires autonomous companies to get a permit from the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles to operate fully driverless fleets.

Tesla plans to open its autonomous ride-hailing network to private owners of the cars in early 2026. This will enable Tesla owners to add their vehicles to the fleet of cab services during idle hours, allowing them to earn money.

As with everything Elmo, believe it when you see it. But don’t use it. Waymo is already testing here – I’ve seen a couple of their cars around – so if you must use one of these things, you have other options. Don’t put any money in Elmo’s pocket.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

So now what for the hemp business?

I can think of one thing they should do.

As part of the spending deal to end the government shutdown, federal lawmakers approved a provision cracking down on hemp products containing THC, restoring a ban Texas Republicans sought to impose earlier this year.

The funding package, passed by the U.S. House and signed into law by President Donald Trump on Wednesday, includes language banning the sale of hemp-derived products with more than 0.4 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the psychoactive element in marijuana. The measure would criminalize almost all consumable hemp products nationwide.

The provision was added at the last minute to a bill that provides yearlong funding for the Department of Agriculture. It closes what proponents of the ban call a “loophole” from the 2018 farm bill that allowed the hemp industry to take off without federal regulations. Unless Congress reverses course, the ban is set to start a year after the legislation goes into effect. Opponents of the provision warn it will effectively shut down Texas’ $8 billion hemp industry and the thousands of jobs associated with the sale of consumable THC products.

In the lead-up to the vote that sent the funding deal to President Donald Trump’s desk, Republicans in Texas’ congressional delegation were divided over the hemp ban. Sen. John Cornyn supported the provision, voting against an amendment that proposed to strip the hemp language, while Sen. Ted Cruz was one of two Republicans who voted for the amendment, arguing that hemp and marijuana should be regulated at the state level rather than through a “one-size-fits-all federal standard.”

The House did not take a one-off vote on the hemp ban, but some Texas Republicans weighed in against the idea, despite voting for the overall funding package. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Houston, said he believes a ban should be decided by individual states.

“That wasn’t going to make me vote against this and keep the government shut down,” he said. “We’ll leave that issue for another day.”

Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Richmond, agreed that he would prefer the hemp ban was not part of the funding deal, but said reopening the government was more important.

Other Republicans, including Rep. Keith Self, R-McKinney, and Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Waco, praised the bill for closing the loophole.

Sessions, a vocal proponent of the hemp ban, said the bill would close a loophole “that allowed intoxicating and dangerous high-potency THC products like Delta-8 to flood our communities.”

[…]

The federal crackdown on hemp products is a letdown for advocates in Texas who spent months fighting to defeat the proposed statewide ban.

Heather Fazio, the director of the Texas Cannabis Policy Center, said it was disappointing that the issue was rearing its head again in Congress on the heels of the “long, drug out fight for freedom” against the state-level ban.

The federal ban will hurt entrepreneurs and consumers in the state who have come to rely on hemp products, Fazio said.

“Banning it and sending us back into an era of prohibition is going to cause far more harm than good,” she said. “The U.S. should regulate rather than prohibit hemp products.”

Opponents of the ban emphasize that millions of Americans have relied on these hemp-derived products since they were legalized by Congress in 2018.

“Hemp is too vital to the American economy and to the livelihoods of millions to be dismantled by rushed, politically driven legislation,” the Texas Hemp Business Council said in a statement Tuesday. “As we proved in Texas, we will continue to pursue every legal and legislative option to overturn these harmful provisions and restore a fair, science-based system that continues to protect minors, ensure product safety and preserve the economic opportunities Congress created in 2018.”

See here for the background. The ban doesn’t take effect for a year, so as noted there’s time to try to pass another bill to reverse it. But that would mean convincing the same Congress that just agreed to the ban to overturn the work they just did. (Yes, I know, there are shutdown nuances to all this, but still.) That seems like a difficult task.

You know what might be easier? Convincing the next Congress to throw out the ban, especially if that next Congress has more hemp supporters. That means supporting candidates against those who supported the ban, and that will mostly mean supporting Democrats. Not entirely – yes, I know, Ted Cruz opposed the ban, Dan Crenshaw gets partial credit, and our old pal Henry Cuellar voted for the bill in its final form – but mostly. Keith Self would be a good target under either Congressional map, and then of course there’s Big John Cornyn or whichever of the slavering opponents he’s drawn in his primary if they take him down. The hemp industry has a chance here to be less stupid than the casino industry (very much not a high bar to clear) by electing more supporters and un-electing more opponents, instead of throwing even more money at an ever-expanding and always useless army of lobbyists. You can do it, hemp industry! Support candidates who will support you! It’s so crazy it just might work! The Chron and The Barbed Wire have more.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Mike Collier to run for Lite Guv as an independent

What are you doing, Mike?

Mike Collier

Mike Collier, a two-time Democratic nominee for lieutenant governor, announced on Thursday that he is again running to be the state’s second-in-command — but this time as an independent.

Collier, an accountant and auditor, lost his previous bids to Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the powerful Republican who presides over the state Senate, in 2018 and 2022. Running as an independent, he is branding himself as a protector of public education who also aims to “restore fiscal integrity” and return power to Texans from political insiders.

“Everything starts with our public schools,” Collier said in a statement. “But Dan Patrick is trying to dismantle them with vouchers and culture wars. I’m running to stop him and to fully fund our public schools, respect our teachers, and make sure every child in Texas has a chance to succeed.”

Patrick beat Collier by 5 points the first time the two went head-to-head and handily beat him four years later, claiming a third term with a 10-point margin.

Collier’s candidacy could complicate the path for the Democratic nominee if he ends up siphoning Democratic votes. State Rep. Vikki Goodwin, D-Austin, is the only major candidate to enter the primary to oppose Patrick.

Let me first say that it’s a lot easier to say that you will run for something statewide as an independent than it is to actually do so. Here are all the requirements to run as an independent candidate in Texas. The TL;dr of this is:

1. You need to collect enough valid signatures to exceed one percent of the total votes cast in the previous gubernatorial race. In 2022, there were 8,102,908 such votes cast, so you need at least 81K signatures. Of course, you should collect more than that since some number of them will not be valid for one reason or another.

2. You can’t start collecting them until after the March primary, and your filing deadline is 30 days after the primary runoff. Basically, that’s a three-month window.

3. Anyone who votes in a primary or a primary runoff is ineligible to sign your petition. In other words, the most politically engaged voters are out of bounds for you.

That’s a lot to do in a relatively short amount of time, and the exclusion of primary voters raises the bar. It’s doable, but it takes resources and organization. Good luck with that.

And that last paragraph doesn’t go far enough. I’ll be blunt, if 2026 is a better year for Dems than 2018 was, then Mike Collier could bear Dan Patrick head to head (*), and Vikki Goodwin could beat Dan Patrick head to head. But Mike Collier and Vikki Goodwin on the same ballot as Dan Patrick will cannibalize each others’ votes, and that will make it nigh impossible for either of them to beat Dan Patrick. The single best thing Mike Collier could do to ensure Dan Patrick’s re-election is qualify for the ballot as an independent. If Collier wants to challenge Goodwin in the primary, I say have at it and let the voters decide. But if Collier goes down this path, he will betray everything he says he stands for. As someone who likes and has admired Mike Collier since he first appeared on the scene, I really hope he rethinks this.

(*) The presence of a Libertarian candidate would hurt Patrick a little, the presence of a Green candidate would hurt Collier or Goodwin a little but not as much as a Libertarian would hurt Patrick. The main thing either would accomplish is to allow the winner to not have to get fifty percent of the vote.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paxton sues Harris County over immigrant legal services

This fucking guy, I swear.

Still a crook any way you look

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Harris County for allocating county funds to programs that help undocumented people get access to legal support.

The county, home to Houston, created the Immigrant Legal Services Fund program in 2020 and last month appropriated an additional $1.3 million to keep it going. The program sends funds to five organizations that help people facing deportation get lawyers.

In a statement, Paxton called the program “evil and wicked,” as well as unconstitutional. This is the latest in a flurry of headline-grabbing lawsuits filed by Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate, aimed at organizations that support immigrants.

The Harris County Jail leads the nation in ICE detainers — a request from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to hold a person for deportation — as federal and state immigration enforcement has kicked into high gear under President Donald Trump.

The lawsuit was filed in Harris County District Court. Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee said in a statement that the program was “perfectly legal” and his office would defend it in court.

“This lawsuit is a cheap political stunt,” he said. “At a time when the president has unleashed ICE agents to terrorize immigrant neighborhoods, deport U.S. citizens, and trample the law, it’s shameful that Republican state officials are joining in instead of standing up for Texans.”

Let me start with the observation that if a program that has been in existence since 2020 is in fact unconstitutional, that says something about Ken Paxton’s legal acumen. Beyond that, I think the line about this being “the latest in a flurry of headline-grabbing lawsuits filed by Paxton, who is running for U.S. Senate” pretty much sums it up. He wants the headline more than anything else, and while he would like to win he doesn’t need to, as he can still then complain about radical leftist judges, even if they were appointed by Greg Abbott. Same shit, different day. The Chron has more.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas sues Roblox

This is a new one on me.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing the online gaming platform Roblox for allegedly exposing children to sexually explicit content and exploitation, the latest in a flurry of lawsuits from his office aimed at big business.

Texas is the third state to sue Roblox, after Kentucky and Louisiana, on the grounds that the company is not sufficiently protecting minors. Dozens of private suits have been filed in the last few months as well, primarily by families who say their children were sexually abused, exploited or exposed to inappropriate content while using the gaming platform.

On Thursday, a California judge ruled that a high-profile lawsuit against Roblox must proceed in the public eye, after the company tried to handle it in private arbitration.

In a statement, Roblox said it shares Paxton’s commitment to keeping kids and teens safe online and pointed to “industry-leading protocols” it had employed to protect users.

“We are disappointed that, rather than working collaboratively with Roblox on this industry-wide challenge and seeking real solutions, the AG has chosen to file a lawsuit based on misrepresentations and sensationalized claims,” a spokesperson said in a statement.

[…]

In 2023, Texas lawmakers strengthened laws requiring social media platforms to protect minors from inappropriate content online. That legislation is still fighting its way through the courts and parts have been blocked for being unconstitutionally vague.

But Paxton has used the remaining provisions of the law to bring lawsuits against TikTok and now, Roblox. The litigation against TikTok is ongoing.

The Roblox lawsuit is filed in West Texas’ King County, the second least populous county in Texas with just 265 residents and no incorporated communities. One judge, Jennifer Habert, hears cases in King County, as well as three others.

My kids are a little too old for Roblox, so I have no context for any of this. Here’s more on the Louisiana and Kentucky cases, plus Roblox’s response to Louisiana, and here’s more on that California case, which was initiated by an individual and not an AG. For more on the SCOPE Act, see here, here, and here.

I have no reason to trust Roblox, but I wouldn’t trust Ken Paxton to pass me the gravy at Thanksgiving, so there’s a lot to keep in mind here. Also, too, filing in King County, population 265, reeks of judge-shopping. I don’t know enough about Judge Habert to say, but there has to be some reason for this. We’ll see how it goes.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chris Bell to run for Governor

From the inbox:

Chris Bell

Chris Bell, former U.S. Congressman, launched his Texas Gubernatorial campaign Monday, November 10, 2025, at the Texas Capitol in Austin. Bell enters the Texas Governor’s race with years of public service
experience and a successful record of winning landmark ethics reform legislation.

“Today, I am announcing my candidacy for Governor of Texas, offering a clear alternative who cares about all Texans, not just the privileged few. Sitting on the sidelines while corruption in the office of the Governor’s office is on vivid display isn’t an option,” announced Bell. “Texans are saying enough is enough. Those of us with experience and know how government works must step up to lead,” Bell stated.

Link to Video of Chris Bell’s Full Announcement (link expires on 11/13/25):

Bell’s campaign will focus on ethics reform, education, and affordability, livability, and opportunity for all Texans while promising a more positive direction for Texas without taking directives from Washington D.C.

Voters may select Bell as the Texas Democratic Gubernatorial candidate in the March 3, 2026 Democratic primary. The 2026 Texas Gubernatorial election is November 3, 2026.

Campaign Website: https://chrisbelltexas.com

More about Chris Bell:
Chris Bell’s values and enthusiasm for public service were instilled by his parents, a journalist and Marine Corps veteran from the “Greatest Generation.” A lifelong Texan, and longtime champion of human rights and freedoms, Bell sees the primary value of politics as making life better, particularly for those less fortunate individuals, families, and communities struggling with it. He understands what power, greed, and ambition can lead to, has battled political corruption at its highest levels, and has won those fights.

Bell is an attorney, former Houston City Council Member, former Congressman, and the 2006 Democratic nominee for Governor of Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Texas at Austin and South Texas College of Law Houston. Bell is a civil rights champion, two-time Human Rights Campaign award winner, NAACP “A” rated congressman, former national NARAL Pro-choice America Board member, and former chair of Clean Energy Fund Texas. He now makes his home in Chappell Hill, Texas.

I hadn’t realized he had moved to Chappell Hill. I’m sure we’ll be seeing more of him around here in the next couple of months. Bell joins Gina Hinojosa, Andrew White, Bobby Cole, and Benjamin Flores. Seems pretty likely at this point that this will go to a runoff. I’ll be very interested to see what the January finance reports look like.

I will say this much: Chris Bell got screwed in 2006, and I will die on that hill. VaLinda Hathcox, Hank Gilbert, and Dale Henry all got more votes in that election than Rick Perry did. If the people who were Democratic enough to vote for those folks also pushed the button for Chris Bell, well, the last 20 years would have been at least a little different. We’ll see what he can bring in 2026. The Trib, the DMN and KVUE have more.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Paxton and Jolt sue each other

Dude’s definitely running to win a primary. He’s thirstier than a marathon runner in Arizona.

Still a crook any way you look

Jolt Initiative, a nonprofit that aims to increase civic participation among Latinos, is suing Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to block his efforts to shut them down. Paxton announced Monday that he was seeking to revoke the nonprofit’s charter, alleging that the group had orchestrated “a systematic, unlawful voter registration scheme.”

This is not the first legal back-and-forth between Jolt and Paxton’s office. Last year, the organization successfully sued to stop the state’s investigation into their voter registration efforts. In the new suit, Jolt’s lawyers argue Paxton’s efforts to shut them down are retaliation. The attorney general’s office has also in recent years targeted other organizations aiding Latinos and migrants, such as the effort to investigate and shut down El Paso-based Annunciation House.

“Jolt is simply the latest target of his unlawful campaign to undermine and silence civil rights groups in Texas,” said Mimi Marziani, a lawyer representing the nonprofit.

The background: In August 2024, Fox News host Maria Bartiromo said on X that a friend had seen organizations registering migrants to vote outside state drivers license facilities in Fort Worth and Weatherford. But local officials, including the Parker County Republican chair, said there was no evidence backing the post.

Bartiromo’s debunked claims still prompted an attorney general investigation into organizations including Jolt.

Jolt then sued for a temporary restraining order, saying that Paxton’s probe would harm the organization as well as put its workers and volunteers at risk. In October 2024, both sides agreed to pause their legal fight and Jolt was allowed to continue its work, while the courts addressed a different lawsuit involving the tool used by Paxton to investigate the group. The attorney general’s office now said in its recent court filing that it has agreed to not issue another subpoena, instead opting to launch a new lawsuit.

[…]

Paxton’s filing didn’t provide evidence of Jolt registering noncitizens to vote. Instead, it said the group’s decision to hold voter registration drives near DMV locations “illuminates its unlawful motive.”

“This is because U.S. citizens can already register to vote at any DMV with proof of citizenship,” the court document said. “Thus, there is no need for a VDR at such locations.”

Paxton brought the lawsuit in Tarrant County, saying that a “substantial part of the events” underlying its claims took place there.

“JOLT is a radical, partisan operation that has, and continues to, knowingly attempt to corrupt our voter rolls and weaken the voice of lawful Texas voters,” he said in a news release. “I will make sure they face the full force of the law.”

What Jolt says:  The nonprofit filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday, asking a judge to stop Paxton’s state lawsuit because it infringes on their rights under the First Amendment and the Voting Rights Act.

In particular, Jolt said in a court filing that its volunteer didn’t do anything wrong because Texas’ election code does allow for a person to appoint their parent as “an agent” to “complete and sign a registration application”  for them. The parent must also be a qualified voter or must have submitted a registration application and be eligible to vote, according to the code.

“Here, the State provides very few particularized factual allegations in its Petition to support its Motion for Leave, instead relying upon sweeping but unsupported claims about Jolt’s motives, beliefs and activities,” the group said in its initial response to Paxton’s lawsuit.

See here, here, and here for some background. Paxton’s been a very busy little boy lately, and while I can’t fully evaluate the merits of his actions, numerous clues suggest they’re more about getting headlines than results – the hyperbolic language, his choice of targets, the fierce response he’s drawn, etc. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t also want the results – I have no doubt that he does – or that he won’t be able to get them – I’m sure he’s hiring expensive lawyers to argue his cases – because who knows what may happen with any of them. I’m just saying, his first priority is throwing red meat to the base, and this is how he does it. How it affects anyone else is not his concern.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of November 10

The Texas Progressive Alliance is feeling blue in the good way as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Off the Kuff has some initial election analysis and some good news from the school board races.

SocraticGadfly notes that the push to revive uranium mining could have environmental consequences in South Texas as well as the Desert Southwest original mining homeland.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project said so-called union friendly Mayor Whitmire blamed TSA workers for not coming to work for no pay for delays at Houston airports, rather than the right wing thugs running the country.

=====================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

Robert Nagle is spending the month of November finding things to celebrate about the year 1965.

The TSTA Blog rightfully calls Christian nationalism un-American, and opposing it patriotic.

The Barbed Wire tells Greg Abbott he’s not nearly as funny as he thinks he is.

Law Dork finds one good thing to say about Dick Cheney.

Alexandra Edwards bemoans TCU’s craven closure of its Women and Gender Studies (WGST) and Comparative Race and Ethnic Studies (CRES) departments.

In the Pink Texas has a parable for Donald Trump.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Two lawsuits filed against Camp Mystic

This is going to be rough.

The families of six campers and two counselors who died in the July floods at Camp Mystic in Hunt, west of Kerrville, filed two separate lawsuits suing the the camp and members of the family who own it for negligence and wrongful death.

The lawsuits, filed Monday in Travis County, allege that camp management knew of the flooding dangers and neglected to inform parents of those risks, claiming the deaths of 25 campers and two counselors were preventable.

“There is no greater trust than when a parent entrusts the care of their child to another,” the petition on behalf of the family of 8-year-old Lulu Peck states. “Camp Mystic and the people who ran it betrayed that trust. Camp Mystic’s shocking betrayal of that trust caused the horrific, tragic and needless deaths of twenty-seven innocent young girls, including Eloise ‘Lulu’ Peck.  This case seeks accountability for that betrayal and to send a message to other camps – protect the kids in your care.”

The Peck lawsuit names camp owners Dick and Tweety Eastland, Camp Mystic, Mystic Camps Family Partnership, Mystic Camps Management and Natural Fountains Properties as defendants. Britt Eastland, Dick Eastland’s son, is named in the lawsuit as the Eastland family’s representative; the elder Eastland died in the flooding. The multifamily lawsuit names the same defendants, with the addition of Eastland’s other son, Edward, and his wife Mary Liz.

The multifamily lawsuit comes from the families of Anna Margaret Bellows, Lila Bonner, Chloe Childress, Molly DeWitt, Katherine Ferruzzo, Lainey Landry and Blakely McCrory, who died at Camp Mystic. Childress and Ferruzzo were counselors, while the others were campers.

“Today, campers Margaret, Lila, Molly, Lainey, and Blakely should be third graders, and counselors Chloe and Katherine should be freshmen at the University of Texas. They all are gone,” the lawsuit states.

Mystic, which has been in the Eastland family since 1939, has a history of flooding. The Peck lawsuit outlines three incidents within the last century in which floodwaters prompted evacuations, damaged buildings or swept away personal items and vehicles belonging to Mystic campers and staff.

Both lawsuits claim Mystic knew about these issues but still leveraged appeals to FEMA to have the 100-year flood designation removed from some of the buildings at the camp. The Peck lawsuit claims that FEMA amended flood maps in 2013, 2019 and 2020, removing camp-owned structures along the Guadalupe River and Cypress Lake from the designated flood zone.

“Camp Mystic’s requests to amend the FEMA map were an attempt to hide this safety risk from the public including the campers and their parents, avoid the requirement to carry flood insurance, lower the camp’s insurance premiums, and pave the way for expanding structures under less costly regulations,” the Peck lawsuit states, alleging the Eastland family and Camp Mystic management put profits over the lives of campers.

The multifamily lawsuit alleges that the Eastland family “changed the structure of the camp’s ownership with the goal of protecting the family’s land while still distributing large sums of money to themselves.” The companies named in the lawsuit (Camp Mystic, LLC and Natural Fountains Properties, Inc.) were part of a “web of corporate entities” to separate camp ownership from land ownership, the lawsuit states. The Eastlands also maintained control over cabin location and camp layout, according to the document.

The Peck lawsuit alleges that minority shareholders testified in a previous legal dispute that some areas of the camp weren’t suitable for recreation because “it floods.” Those shareholders were members of the Eastland family, the lawsuit claims.

There’s more, it’s a gift link, read the rest. I still have a hard time reading about what happened at Camp Mystic without getting emotional. I can only imagine how wrenching all this must be for the families. These lawsuits join the two others that have been filed against an RV park in Kerrville. We’re going to be living with this for a long time. Whatever happens with the litigation, I hope everyone who was affected is able to find peace. There’s lots more, from CNN, ABC News, the NYT, the Statesman, the Associated Press, and the Trib.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

A backdoor THC ban

Oops. Or maybe this was the plan all along.

The Texas hemp industry, fresh from fending off an all-out ban by the state Legislature, is facing another extinction-level event — this time from Congress.

The U.S. Senate on Monday night agreed to language that would ban almost all THC-containing hemp products nationwide. The language is tucked into a spending deal inked by the chamber to end the federal government shutdown that could be signed by President Donald Trump as early as Wednesday.

Senators also rejected a last-ditch amendment by Republican U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky to scrap the ban, with Paul warning that the language would “kill an entire industry”, including many farmers. The provision would only go into effect one year after the deal’s passage, and Congress could repeal or reverse the decision at some point in the next year.

The move represents a particularly stinging loss to hemp businesses in Texas, which spent much of the last year lobbying to save their industry from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s crusade against THC.

“I appreciate Congress addressing this important issue at the national level,” Patrick said in a social media post celebrating the vote. “I believe this ban will save a generation from getting hooked on dangerous drugs.”

Proponents of the ban say it closes a loophole in the 2018 law that decriminalized hemp and resulted in an industry boom, a similar argument made by Patrick in his quest for a state ban. Industry groups representing alcohol and marijuana products — whose sales have taken a hit in part from the rise in cheaper hemp products — have encouraged Republicans in Congress to crack down on hemp.

The vote on Paul’s amendment split the two Texas senators, with John Cornyn voting to preserve the ban and Ted Cruz siding with 22 Democrats in opposition. Cruz later said he supported a state-by-state approach and praised Abbott for having vetoed the Texas ban earlier this year.

“Reasonable minds can disagree, and a blanket federal prohibition disempowers the voters in each of the fifty States,” Cruz wrote on X.

[…]

The new language in the shutdown deal essentially changes the federal definition of hemp, lowering the allowable concentration of cannabinoids, introducing a cap of 0.4 milligrams of THC per container of hemp products.

Hemp proponents say the language would essentially wipe out their booming industry nationwide, banning all natural and converted THC, like Delta-9 and Delta-8, in all consumable forms, including gummies, drinks, vapes and topical creams.

Man, it’s so disorienting when Ted Cruz does the right thing. He voted for the final bill, of course, so only partial credit, but still. This isn’t the final word – in addition to the delay in implementation of this ban, the reopening bill is being slowed down by Sen. Rand Paul, and it still has to pass the House, which is its own little nest of drama. If the House does pass this, it will surely be along party lines, so that will provide another way for Dems here to attack Republicans for the failed-but-not-dead effort to pass a ban here. This is their problem, we need to make them own it.

Posted in National news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Recall effort officially falls short

They were not close.

Mayor John Whitmire

A much-hyped effort to recall Houston Mayor John Whitmire from office — the subject of multiple news stories and social media posts over the past year — fell significantly short of its goal as the 30-day window closed this week.

According to organizer Ethan Hale, canvassers collecting signatures returned “just over 2,000 or so — something like that.”

In order to place the recall question before voters, the campaign needed to collect more than 63,000 signatures in 30 days.

The campaign raised less than $5,000 of a $100,000 goal and relied heavily on volunteers.

“I think we knew the odds were not exactly in our favor, and I think we were more so hoping more of our volunteers would turn out, but didn’t really happen that way,” Hale told Houston Public Media.

Hale and his fellow organizers used harsh language in their attacks on Whitmire, branding him a “fascist” and lambasting a range of his policy positions. In particular, they criticized the administration’s increased budget for the police department as most other departments saw cuts, and they opposed his more car-centric approach to transportation infrastructure compared to his predecessor, the late Sylvester Turner.

Whitmire previously called the effort “silly,” and his spokesperson did not comment on the shortfall this week.

Brandon Rottinghaus, professor of political science at the University of Houston, led research with his students on recall efforts across the country. A major takeaway: organizers were rarely successful, with the researchers finding only 56 recalls from 2007 to 2022.

“The organization for recall elections tends to be pretty robust — you’ve got a lot of people out canvassing, you’ve got door-to-door walkers, you’ve got money behind it, and you’ve got a real message,” Rottinghaus said. “It’s not clear that those things happened in this case, and so as a result, that’s the recipe for how recall election efforts fail.”

See here for the previous update. I’m not going to relitigate why the recall was doomed to fail – I think I’ve been pretty clear from the beginning why this was not a serious effort – but as someone who is not a fan of this Mayor, all this pratfall does is make the rest of us look bad, too. And I resent that. Get your act together before you go forth with something like this or don’t go forth at all. This wasn’t a noble failure, the kind you can learn from and build on. It was just a mess.

That said, I will take issue with this:

The flaccid effort to recall Whitmire from office and Hale’s failed run for office weren’t the only disappointments for opponents of the mayor this week. Former city council chief of staff Jordan Thomas — a progressive urbanist who framed his bid for the at-large city council seat as a potential challenge to Whitmire — came in third with 16% of the vote.

“I think it’s a bit disappointing how things ended with Jordan Thomas,” Hale said. “I think for a lot of us fighting the mayor, it’s very disappointing.”

Rottinghaus, however, said Thomas’ campaign “didn’t lose, it just ran out of time.”

“If there was momentum, it tended to be late, and that often doesn’t get the job done,” he said. “In a relatively short primary with low turnout, it’s a hard thing to get attention to a relatively unknown candidate. … Thomas was fighting an uphill battle against two fairly well established opponents.”

I agree with Prof. Rottinghaus here. Jordan Thomas, a young first-time candidate with little money, exceeded my expectations. I’ve seen candidates like him fail to break five percent in the past. There were multiple candidates that have run for office before, some multiple times, that he surpassed. He’s in a pretty good position to have an influence on the runoff, if he wants to. This right here, that’s something you can build on. Make of that what you will.

Posted in Local politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Whitmire finally admits that HPD is cooperating with ICE

Goddamn it.

Houston Mayor John Whitmire acknowledged Saturday that the city is cooperating with federal immigration authorities after denying for months that Houston police would get involved with immigration enforcement.

Whitmire was a guest speaker at a conference Saturday hosted by former Kemah Mayor Bill King, a fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. During their conversation, King mentioned that Whitmire had recently been the subject of a New York Times profile about how the mayor is keeping Houston safe while President Donald Trump sends militarized immigration agents into other Democratic cities like Chicago and Los Angeles.

Whitmire, speaking to a largely friendly audience of about 250 people, lauded Houston’s diversity and the contributions that immigrants bring to the city, but said that other cities were in “turmoil.” He said that some level of cooperation with the Trump administration was necessary to keep Houston from suffering the same fate.

“I’m not going to say that we’re not cooperating with ICE, because that’s frankly not true,” Whitmire said.

Whitmire then shared an anecdote about how an unnamed official recently urged him to try to get Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers out of Houston’s public spaces. The mayor said that he couldn’t do that, because the Trump administration would send 500 more officers in response.

The Chronicle has previously reported that Houston police officers have called ICE on over 100 people since the start of Trump’s term, the result of a department policy to contact the agency if officers encounter someone with an open immigration warrant.

Whitmire, however, has been vague about the city’s involvement in immigration enforcement when asked, saying that Houston does not “deal with immigration” but admitting that officers have an obligation to call agencies that issue warrants.mb32″ data-block-type=”text” data-dropcap=”false”>

The vast majority of HPD’s calls to ICE have stemmed from traffic stops, and most of the administrative warrants issued by ICE are for outstanding deportation orders, rather than violent felonies. A spokesperson for Whitmire did not return a request for comment.

ICE appears to be boosting its activity in the Houston area as President Donald Trump attempts to follow through on his campaign promises for mass deportations. Last week, the agency announced that its agents arrested over 1,500 people in Houston over a 10-day period, its largest operation in the city under the Trump administration so far.

Immigration advocates say that the police department’s willingness to cooperate with immigration agents risks harming public safety by discouraging immigrants from reporting crimes. Earlier this year, Houston police officers called ICE on a woman reporting domestic abuse.

“It worsens public safety when victims of a crime are not going to report or cooperate with investigators for fear that they may end up being deported,” Zenobia Lai, executive director of the Houston Immigration Legal Services Collaborative, said at the time. “That doesn’t make any of us any safer.”

See here for some background. I had a hard time writing this part of the post because everything up to this point made me so angry. I will defend the devil long enough to say that I would absolutely not want to be the Democratic mayor of a Democratic city, especially in a Republican state, at this point in time. I would not want to have to deal with the constant threats to our safety, our independence, our dignity, our humanity, our people. I can understand the instinct to duck and cover and hope that the monsters go off in chase of more visible targets. It’s a natural response to abusive behavior.

But it doesn’t work, and in the course of not working it corrupts your soul, because you find yourself in the position – consciously or not – of rooting for the abuser to pick on someone else and leave you alone. Being quiet and compliant doesn’t stop your things from getting broken, it just makes you think maybe it can. Your only hope is to fight back, ideally in concert with others in the same position so as to find strength in numbers. It may well not work, and indeed it may well cause you to be treated more harshly, at least in the short term, than you might have been otherwise.

But at least you’ll know you tried. At least you’ll know that as the strongest person in your city, you stood up for those who truly have no power and did what you could to protect them. Because if you don’t, who will?

I doubt John Whitmire thinks this way. I have no idea how he thinks about anything at this point, but I have some idea about how he doesn’t think about things. What I do know is that he’s the wrong person for the moment we face. It’s not about how “progressive” or “centrist” anyone is, it’s about whether they’ll stand up to the bullies. He has failed at that task. I don’t know what else to say.

Posted in Crime and Punishment, La Migra | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Paxton sues Galveston ISD over Ten Commandments display

We need some real guidance here.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Galveston Independent School District on Friday for not following a new state law requiring schools to display the Ten Commandments in classrooms while the legislation is challenged in federal court.

State lawmakers earlier this year passed Senate Bill 10, which requires schools to accept posters or framed copies of the Ten Commandments and to display them “in a conspicuous place” in classrooms. Gov. Greg Abbott signed SB 10 in late June, a day after a federal appeals court in Louisiana found a similar law “plainly unconstitutional.”

After SB 10 took effect on Sept. 1, state Sen. Mayes Middleton, R-Galveston, donated posters with the Ten Commandments to the Galveston district, according to the lawsuit. But Galveston ISD’s board of trustees voted in late October to delay hanging any donated posters, citing ongoing lawsuits over the constitutionality of the law. Galveston ISD is not part of the lawsuits.

“We will closely monitor any possible litigation and consult with our legal counsel before making further decisions,” a Galveston spokesperson said in an email Friday. “In the meantime, our focus remains on elevating instruction, valuing a respectful culture, and promoting a safe environment for students and staff.”

[…]

It is unclear whether the lawsuit against Galveston ISD conflicts with state attorneys’ arguments defending SB 10. In the first case challenging the law’s constitutionality, they have said the law does not pose any threat or harm to families in part because it doesn’t specify what would happen to districts that choose not to comply.

See here, here, here, here, and here for the background. That’s one way to know that this has gone on too long without some kind of resolution. Well, the original ruling by Judge Biery should have been enough, but we remain cursed with Ken Paxton, so.

The Fifth Circuit will eventually offer some clarity, one hopes of the good kind. A ruling on the most recent lawsuit, also filed before Judge Biery, should offer a few more districts some protection. I wish it were easier, but the answer for now continues to be for more districts to file these suits. Until then, we wait.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

San Antonio and Dallas to fight the rainbow crosswalk ban

Good for them!

San Antonio has formally asked the Texas Department of Transportation to approve an exemption allowing the city to keep its rainbow-colored crosswalks at North Main Avenue and East Evergreen Street, arguing that the intersection has become safer since the markings were installed in 2018.

In a Nov. 5 letter, Assistant City Manager John Peterek referenced Gov. Greg Abbott’s Oct. 8 directive that ordered TxDOT to ensure cities and counties remove “any and all political ideologies from our streets.”

The order warns that noncompliance could result in the loss of state and federal transportation funding and bans “non-standard surface markings, signage and signals that do not directly support traffic control or safety,” including “symbols, flags or other markings conveying social, political or ideological messages.”

That directive identified the intersection, located within the city’s Pride Cultural Heritage District, as being out of compliance with the new rule.

The city argues the rainbow design is not prohibited under the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways — the federal safety standard Texas adopts and TxDOT enforces. That manual defines traffic control devices as signs, signals and markings that communicate safety or regulatory information.

Because the rainbow pattern does not guide or regulate traffic, city officials contend it falls outside of TxDOT’s enforcement authority, since the department’s authority over roadway markings is derived from Texas Transportation Code 544.002, which ties regulation to the state’s adoption of the federal manual.

The Office of the City Manager pointed to a letter from the U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to Gov. Greg Abbott, which it says “prompted” TxDOT’s action. Duffy encouraged states to “get back to the basics — using data to guide decision-making.”

In response, the city reviewed crash and injury reports from the three years before and three years after the rainbow crosswalk’s installation and found fewer pedestrian incidents following its addition. The analysis showed two pedestrian injuries before installation, one in the three years after, and one incident since — three total in seven years.

By comparison, a nearby intersection without the rainbow design — North Main Avenue and Cypress Street — saw four pedestrian injuries during the same period.

See here, here, and here for some background. Dallas is also seeking an exemption but there’s not a lot of detail about where and on what grounds. Austin has said it will seek exemptions, but they have lots of potentially affected crosswalks and it wasn’t clear when I wrote this how many of them they would aim to protect.

I don’t know what will happen. It’s more likely than not that TxDOT will reject all of these applications and the crosswalks will be erased as Abbott demands. But at least they all will have tried, unlike Houston, where our gutless Mayor and Metro board rolled over in submission. Your choices define your legacy, that much I know.

Posted in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rep. Al Green to run in the new CD18

As expected.

Rep. Al Green

U.S. Rep. Al Green announced Friday that he plans to run in the redrawn 18th Congressional District, setting up a competitive primary between the longtime Houston Democrat and whichever candidate wins the upcoming special election runoff to decide the seat’s occupant through the end of next year.

Green began his speech not by talking about himself, but of President Donald Trump.

“This democracy belongs to the people, it doesn’t belong to one man,” Green said from a Southwest Houston hotel. “He is an authoritarian, and we are going to make sure that he knows that the people in the 18th Congressional District are going to send somebody to Congress that he fears.”

Green has been a strong advocate of the effort to impeach Trump, and he said continuing to criticize the president will be one of his priorities if he secures another term in Congress — but he’s facing a crowded race.

Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee and former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards, both Democrats, finished atop a field of 16 candidates in Tuesday’s election to fill out the remainder of late Rep. Sylvester Turner’s term representing the district under its old lines. Green plans to run in the March primary, which will be held under the 18th District’s new boundaries created by Republicans’ mid-cycle redistricting this summer. Menefee has already announced he plans to run in the March primary, which will take place weeks after the runoff. Edwards has yet to reveal her plans beyond the special election.

Green has represented Texas’ 9th Congressional District — anchored in the southern parts of Houston — since 2005. But that district was redrawn by Texas Republicans in their new congressional map to favor the GOP, and its boundaries were moved to eastern Harris County and Liberty County, pulling in almost none of the same area as before. The new 9th Congressional District went from voting for Kamala Harris in 2024 by 44 percentage points to one that President Donald Trump would have carried by a 20-point margin under the new lines.

Much of Green’s turf in the old 9th District was drawn into the new 18th District, including Central Southwest Houston, NRG Stadium and Missouri City. It’s a deep-blue district with a long history of Black representation, having sent titans including former Reps. Barbara Jordan and Mickey Leland. The new 18th District would have voted for Harris by a 54-point margin in 2024 had it existed.

[…]

In August, Green heavily hinted that he planned to run in the 18th District, noting that he and the majority of his constituents had changed district numbers, but he said he would not announce his plans until after the Nov. 4 special election to avoid confusing Houstonians.

Candidates can begin filing Saturday for a spot on the 2026 primary ballot, the start of a monthlong window that runs until Dec. 8. The timing ensures that Edwards and any other prospective candidates will need to decide whether to put their name on the ballot before their runoff election.

One way or another this will not be my problem. If this map doesn’t get blocked – and with the filing period now open, it really is now or never for that to happen – I will be in CD07 next year. I like Rep. Green – what’s not to like? – but this fight, if it happens, is very much one of the things that Republicans had in mind when they redid the Congressional map. It wasn’t just about drawing new seats for them, though after Tuesday their five-seat goal is looking shaky, it was about forcing Democrats to fight among themselves. Lloyd Doggett chose to step down rather than engage in that fight. Julie Johnson will be running in CD33, where Marc Veasey currently serves. Al Green is running in CD18. That’s what we have to deal with right now. The goal is to get to the point where we can not only undo this damage, but make things better. We have to get through this before we can get there.

By the way, the runoff for the special election in CD18 may be as late as February. That means that Christian Menefee and Amanda Edwards will be campaigning in one place and with one set of voters for the special election, and in a different place with different voters for the primary. When we are in a position to fix things, I hope we don’t forget that. I for one will not be ready to turn any pages in the short term.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Loving County Election 2022 rerun

Loving County wraps up one of its ongoing story lines.

It might have been the longest election campaign for the shortest office term in recent Texas history.

Loving County Justice of the Peace Angela Medlin, County/District Clerk Mozelle Carr and Commissioner Ysidro Renteria all were elected into office in 2022. But a series of court challenges brought by their opponents concluded that a dozen voters who had cast ballots didn’t really live in this sparsely populated county near the New Mexico border.

Because the margin of victory in each of the three races had been 12 or fewer votes, Loving County was ordered to conduct an extremely rare election do-over.

Yet the courts move slowly. The reelection was finally held three years after the original vote – meaning only a single remaining year in office was at stake.

Thanks to Loving County’s tangled history of voter shenanigans, the Texas Secretary of State took the unusual step of sending inspectors to monitor the races in the least populated county in the country. Sheriff Dave Landersman, who doubles as the county voter registrar, said the agency sent an inspector out for early voting, and another for Election Day.

On Tuesday, in what would be considered landslide wins – even though the total votes cast numbered only in the dozens – the incumbents were all easily reelected to their offices. Medlin bested challenger Amber King 69 to 28, Carr easily beat Holly Jones 69 to30 and Renteria outpaced Alan Sparks, 11 to 5.

Experts said scrapping the results of an entire election and conducting it all over again is an uncommon event. “Do-over elections are very rare,” said Derek Muller, a nationally recognized elections expert who teaches at Notre Dame Law School.

Steve Huefner, a professor at Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law who has studied contested elections, said one reason for the rarity was that challenges typically had to check two boxes. Not only did a court have to determine that improper voting took place; it also had to show that the number of contested ballots actually could have swung the election.

As a result, Huefner said, election redos are almost always in small, local races, where a contest can be reversed by a relatively small number of disputed votes – “what we call the margin of litigation,” he said.

Following the November 2022 general election, 21 Harris County Republican candidates filed grievances citing alleged irregularities and asking for do-overs. But the victory margins were large enough that most of the challenges failed.

In May 2024, however, a state district court judge found the 1,430 improper votes in the race for the 180th District Court judge could have flipped the result of the contest, in which incumbent Democrat DaSean Jones beat Republican Tami Pierce by just 449 votes. A do-over was ordered, but before it could be held Jones resigned and Gov. Greg Abbott appointed Pierce to the bench.

Huefner said another reason do-over elections are uncommon is they can be seen as unfair, favoring candidates with more money and staying power. Thanks to the long waits between the original and redo votes, he added, the electorates often aren’t even the same.

Susan Hays, the attorney representing the three challengers, blamed both factors for her clients’ losses on Tuesday. “The failure of the courts to expedite this case was an immense failure of democracy,” she said.

See here, here, and here for the background. I will say again, the simplest answer here is to abolish Loving County as a political entity and fold it all back into Reeves County. Having a county with that small a population and that much oil money is an unstable combination, as all these events have shown. The fix is simple, if the Lege cares to take it up.

Posted in Election 2022, Election 2025, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Paxton targeted for mortgage fraud

Nothing is likely to ever come out of this, but pass the popcorn anyway.

Still a crook any way you look

The Trump administration has used allegations of mortgage fraud as a cudgel against the president’s political enemies in New York and California. Now, a small-town official in East Texas is using this same tactic to file a complaint against one of the president’s close Republican allies: Attorney General Ken Paxton.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency under Director Bill Pulte has encouraged the investigation and prosecution of Democrats and other perceived Trump opponents for alleged mortgage fraud.

The most high-profile case involves Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, who the administration has accused of making rental income off a second home she had allegedly claimed as a primary residence. Last month, a federal grand jury indicted James on charges of bank fraud and making false statements.

Pulte has lobbed similar allegations against U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, a Democrat, and Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. All three have denied wrongdoing.

Now, Hunter Bonner, a Republican who lives in the city of Lone Star northeast of Tyler, says he filed a federal mortgage fraud complaint against Paxton.

Bonner, the head of the Marion County Republican Party, said he submitted it Sept. 21 via the online hotline Pulte created earlier this year. He said he made his complaint as a private citizen and not in his role as county party chairman.

According to a copy of the complaint he provided to The Texas Newsroom, Bonner wrote there is evidence Paxton has claimed multiple homes as his primary residence and rented other properties he owns in alleged violation of the terms of his mortgages. He cited a report by the Associated Press that said Paxton had claimed at least three homes as primary residences on mortgages.

Lower rates Paxton secured for these homes, the AP story said, could save tens of thousands of dollars over the life of these loans.

“Considering the seriousness of these allegations and media coverage that these issues have received, I am respectfully requesting that an investigation be conducted as soon as possible,” Bonner wrote in the complaint.

[…]

In an interview with The Texas Newsroom, Bonner said he is motivated by his faith. Bonner identifies as a Messianic Jew who believes that Jesus was the Messiah and son of God.

“It doesn’t matter that they’re Republican or not. What’s the right thing to do?” Bonner said. “It’s about exactly that. It’s right versus right and wrong versus wrong.”

The Republican Party of Texas did not respond to requests for comment about the complaint.

The Texas Newsroom has written extensively about Paxton’s growing real estate portfolio, which has grown in recent years to include properties in Hawaii, Florida and Oklahoma. After multiple stories over two years that revealed Paxton did not disclose his complete property ownership to ethics regulators, the attorney general this year listed additional assets on his state financial forms.

Bonner, who describes himself as a lifelong Republican, said he has supported Paxton in general elections but has at times been critical of the attorney general. He opposed calls for Paxton to receive an apology after he beat the impeachment charges, accused one of Paxton’s close advisers of antisemitism and called out Paxton’s alleged adultery.

Paxton’s wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, is seeking divorce on the grounds that he had an extramarital affair. Ken Paxton’s spokesperson has not answered questions about whether the adultery allegations are true.

Bonner has also publicly weighed in on the U.S. Senate matchup, posting on X that it was between “John Cornyn and Clowny McClownface.” He told The Texas Newsroom he does not have a vendetta against Paxton.

“I don’t have a personal beef with him,” Bonner said, adding that his complaint is a test of sorts to see whether the Trump administration will treat all inquiries equally — regardless of the party affiliation of the accused.

“Do we have a justice system that applies across the board? Is the way our founders of this country and even the founders of the state of Texas envisioned? Or is there a two-tier system?” he said.

Bonner said he has not heard back from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which also did not return The Texas Newsroom’s request for comment.

Ken Paxton is more likely to be named the host of a Soul Train reboot than to ever have anything to fear from this complaint. How he got so rich while in office may be a mystery, but it’s not one that will get him into trouble as long as Republicans are in charge of things. And look, we know the guy’s a crook, but unless there’s more to this then what he did here isn’t really a crime anyway, and it shouldn’t be getting enforced by a two-bit thug like Bill Pulte. I admire the gumption and I hope this at least causes Paxton to have to spend time answering questions about his shady financial dealings, but there’s no there there.

Posted in Show Business for Ugly People | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekend link dump for November 9

A Review of Grokipedia, Using Myself as Test Subject”. Spoiler alert, it’s not great.

Anti-Vax Facebook Groups Ushered in Our Current MAHA Nightmare”.

“Big Tech may have outfoxed regulators and its workforce, but [Cory] Doctorow sees a reckoning coming. Absent U.S. regulation, as the Trump administration protects the tech platforms, we may have to rely on Europe to check the tech industry’s power.”

Sure, let Isaac Chotiner interview you. You’ll probably be fine.

RIP, Bob Trumpy, former tight end for the Cincinnati Bengals and Hall of Fame NFL broadcaster.

“No author you have ever heard of is going to be scrabbling for Amazon or Goodreads reviews, and even if they were, they wouldn’t be doing it like this.”

“The Future of Advertising Is AI Generated Ads That Are Directly Personalized to You“. As predicted by Minority Report, of course.

“Here are the best TV shows set in each of the 50 U.S. states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico.” Not a bad list, though I’d definitely have picked some of the honorable mentions instead.

“San Antonio’s eccentric millionaire yeti hunter you’ve probably never heard of”.

RIP, Diane Ladd, three-time Oscar-nominated actor known for Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore among many other roles, mother of actor Laura Dern.

RIP, Victor Conte, founder of the Balco lab that was at the center of a performance-enhancing drug scandal involving high-profile athletes like Barry Bonds and Marion Jones.

RIP, Dick Cheney, and if you don’t know who Dick Cheney is I can’t help you. I don’t normally do block quotes in the Sunday linkdump, but I’ll make an exception for this, from the TPM Morning Memo on Tuesday, the day of this news.

Cheney is Exhibit A for why “polarization” is the wrong word to describe the state of American politics in the 21st century. As his Republican Party marched itself off a cliff, even Dick Cheney, a prior generation’s super villain, was left behind. His full-throated endorsement of Kamala Harris over Donald Trump in 2024 was a last gasp to try to save the constitutional order that he himself had made significantly more brittle during his time in office.

That sounds about right. David Corn has a few thoughts as well.

“The FBI forced out a senior official overseeing aviation shortly after Director Kash Patel grew outraged about revelations of his publicly-available jet logs indicating he’d flown to see his musician girlfriend perform, said three people familiar with the situation.”

“What We Lost When Condé Nast Unceremoniously Shuttered Teen Vogue”.

RIP, Donna Jean Godchaux, Rock and Roll Hall of Fame singer who performed with the Grateful Dead, Elvis Presley, Percy Sledge, and others.

Who among us would not like an Alien: Earth eyeball monster Funko pop in our Christmas stocking?

Good riddance.

“That said, there is an aspect of Trump’s polling that might legitimately start to cause him and his advisors some concern.”

“The Coca-Cola company will be trotting out an AI-generated Christmas ad for the second year in a row. But don’t worry! They promise it doesn’t look awful like the last one did.”

Ali Velshi is your new Steve Kornacki.

“The Anti-Trans Grifters Are Coming For The NWSL”.

“After more than 50 years, Miss Piggy is finally stepping into the spotlight and getting the solo movie treatment she deserves.”

No one had the courage to speak directly to us. No one from Homeland Security could stand in the presence of the Monstrance holding the Blessed Sacrament. No wonder. Evil is repelled, recoils in the presence of Christ.”

“After 35 years, Nancy Pelosi is retiring from Congress”.

The sandwich guy gets justice.

“Florida’s 7-foot-9 Olivier Rioux becomes tallest college basketball player ever”.

Here’s a unique bit of college journalism history for you, at Baylor.

“It’s no surprise that political observers’ sense of what’s happening, the big picture, would shift after an election night in which Democrats are widely perceived having exceeded expectations. What’s notable is that this new sense of the big picture is explained by things that were already the case before election day!”

RIP, Paul Tagliabue, former NFL Commissioner.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | Leave a comment

Another story about Taylor Rehmet

This one has more numbers in it.

Taylor Rehmet

Despite the district’s solid-red reputation, Democrat Taylor Rehmet won the most votes in a Tuesday special election for vacant Senate District 9.

The district, represented by Kelly Hancock since 2013, encompasses northern Tarrant County and much of Fort Worth, and spans into Keller and Southlake. It went for Trump in 2024, 58% to 41% for former Vice President Kamala Harris. Hancock’s Democratic opponent won 40% of votes in a 2022 election for the seat.

But Rehmet, in a special election that aligned with a statewide constitutional election, won 47.6% percent of votes. He’s headed to a runoff with Republican Leigh Wambsganss, who captured 36% of votes. The other Republican in the race, former Southlake Mayor John Huffman, won 16.5%.

So what’s behind Rehmet’s lead? The union leader from Fort Worth was hesitant to speculate in an election night interview. Perhaps it comes down to his humble background and being an honest person, he said.

“I really believe that people can see through all the polish and all the fancy money behind certain politicians, because what matters whenever it comes to representation is, does this person have the integrity needed?” Rehmet said. “Does the person have the drive?”

But experts say his win can partially be seen as a referendum on President Donald Trump, in line with Democratic successes across the country Tuesday night.

“This was a night for Democrats to express their discontent with Trump,” said Jim Riddlespergerger, a TCU political science professor.

Now, Rehmet and Wambsganss will work to get the votes needed to win the coming runoff — a date for which hasn’t been set. And Republicans can’t sit back if they want to keep the district red.

“We cannot take the runoff for granted,” said Tarrant County Commissioner Matt Krause in a social media post. Krause previously served in the Texas House. “The Democrat candidate also had a strong showing which should be a wakeup call to all Republicans in SD 9.”

[…]

“It’s just a different thing when a Democrat runs this strong in a Republican district,” said SMU Political Science Professor Cal Jillson.

There are Democratic voters in the district, though they’ve typically been outnumbered by Republicans, so it’s not a surprise Rehmet would advance to a runoff or even clinch the first place spot, said Riddlesperger.

“But the fact that he got in the upper 40 percent was, in fact, quite surprising,” Riddlesperger said.

[…]

But also contributing to his victory was a desire for Democrats to show opposition to Trump — even if the president wasn’t explicitly on the ballot. Experts said the referendum, to some degree, also extends to state leadership, like Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a Trump surrogate who, like the president, endorsed Wambsganss.

“There’s certainly a lot of concern from voters that the politicians in power aren’t doing enough to help them,” said Brandon Rottinghaus, a University of Houston political science professor.

Tarrant County Democratic Party Chair Allison Campolo also sees the outcome as a rebuke of Republican leadership, including Trump. Rehmet’s favorable outcome is also a signal of the Democrat’s successful campaign, she said.

“Here in Texas, so many of us are represented by so many terrible Republicans who are very extremist, and I think this is a big pushback against everything that’s been happening this year, everything since November 2024,” Campolo said Tuesday night at Rehmet’s watch party.

[…]

Wambsganss, who works as Patriot Mobiles’ chief communication officer, is better positioned in her path to victory come runoff time, Rottinghaus said. Her key to success will be getting Republican voters to turn out, he said.

“She’s in a better position because it’s a Republican leaning district and getting Republicans to vote in these runoffs is an easier task than getting Democrats or independents to come vote,” Rottinghaus said.

Wambsganss said her runoff message remains the same as in the first round of voting.

“I’m there to fight for faith, family and freedom, just like the over three decades that I’ve spent my life doing for Texas and for conservative values,” she said, highlighting issues like lowering property taxes, supporting first responders, border security and education.

Jillson expects Rehmet to continue focusing on the “kitchen table issues.”

“Because that resonated in the election yesterday,” Jillson said.

Rehmet will also likely work to win over Huffman supporters, Riddlesperger said.

“It’s hard for a Democrat to make arguments that will appeal to Republican voters, but it certainly can be done, and it has to be done,” Riddlesperger said.

What do Huffman voters do? “I think many of the Huffman voters stay home,” Jillson said. “Most of the rest, I think, go to Wambsganss. A few go to Rehmet, and the race is close.”

And then there’s Trump’s endorsement, featured prominently in Wambsganss’ bid. Wambsganss will have to weigh focusing on her support for Trump versus a focus on topics beyond social issues, Jillson said.

The president’s support is a double-edged sword, Rottinghaus said.

“It helps her among core Republican voters, who are more likely to turn out in a runoff to a special election,” Rottinghaus said. “But it obviously ties her to Trump’s economy, which a lot of people are frustrated by.”

See here for the first story. I said in that piece that for the Democratic Party and affiliated orgs to get more involved is needed but also at least somewhat risky, in that raising the profile of the race and of Taylor Rehmet could have the effect of getting more Republicans engaged as well. It’s nice to see someone make the point that the Republicans face a similar choice and risk, since this election was in large part a response to Donald Trump. And boy howdy to I cosign what Allison Campolo says. That’s especially true in Tarrant County, between their mid-decade redistricting and their loathsome County Judge and Republican Party Chair.

I guess the way to think about this is that Rehmet has a lead in the number of people who did vote, and a deficit in the number of people who could vote. How exactly do you maximize the former while minimizing the latter? I don’t know, but that’s how he wins. I wish him all the luck in the world.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fifth Circuit allows drag ban enforcement

I’m not quite sure how to interpret this.

Obviously a pervert

Texas can enforce a 2023 law that restricts some public drag shows, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

Senate Bill 12 prohibits drag performers from dancing suggestively or wearing certain prosthetics on public property or in front of children. The law would fine business owners $10,000 for hosting such performances, while those who violate the law could be hit with a Class A misdemeanor.

In September 2023, U.S. District Judge David Hittner declared the law unconstitutional, saying that it “impermissibly infringes on the First Amendment” and that it is “not unreasonable” to think it could affect activities like live theatre or dancing. More than two years later, a three-judge panel in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals unblocked the law and returned the case to the district court.

As part of the ruling, the panel found that most of the plaintiffs — a drag performer, a drag production company and pride groups — failed to show that they intended to conduct a “sexually oriented performance,” and therefore, could not be harmed by the law. The ruling suggests that the federal judges don’t believe all drag shows are sexually explicit.

Critics of the ban have previously raised concerns that Republican lawmakers were portraying all drag performances as inherently sexual or obscene.

And while the law doesn’t have language explicitly referencing drag performances, SB 12’s original version specifically included them. Republican leaders have also made it clear that drag shows are the target.

“Texas Governor Signs Law Banning Drag Performances in Public. That’s right,” Gov. Greg Abbott said in a post on X in June 2023.

SB 12 considers a performance to be sexually oriented if the performer is nude or engages in sexual conduct, which could include “actual contact or simulated contact” between one person and another person’s “buttocks, breast, or any part of the genitals.” It also has to “appeal to the prurient interest in sex” — and most didn’t meet this criteria, according to the appeals court’s ruling.

“To appeal to the ‘prurient interest in sex,’ material, at a minimum, must be ‘in some sense erotic,’” it said.

For instance, a pride group testified that some of its performers may “twerk,” but the panel said none of the conduct it described amounts to a sexually oriented performance. It also said accidental bumping or contact during front-facing hugs don’t count.

The panel did find that a drag production company’s described performances “arguably” are sexually explicit, though the ruling doesn’t specifically say which actions qualify.

“When asked whether the performers ‘simulate contact with the buttocks of another person,’ the owner testified that the performers sit on customers’ laps while wearing thongs and one performer invited a ‘handsome’ male customer ‘to spank her on the butt,’ said the ruling. “When asked whether the performers ‘ever perform gesticulations while wearing prosthetics,’ the owner testified that in 360 Queen’s most recent show, a drag queen ‘wore a breastplate that was very revealing, pulsed her chest in front of people, [and] put her chest in front of people’s faces.’”

Though Judge Kurt Engelhardt, a Trump appointee, also wrote in a footnote that there is “genuine doubt” that these actions are “actually constitutionally protected—especially in the presence of minors.” He was joined by Judge Leslie Southwick, a Bush appointee.

Judge James Dennis, a Clinton appointee, disagrees with this assessment.

“That gratuitous dictum runs headlong into settled First Amendment jurisprudence and threatens to mislead on remand,” Dennis wrote in his partial dissent.

In addition, the appeals court removed most of the defendants from the case, before sending it back to the district court to reconsider a part of SB 12 that focuses on the Texas attorney general’s role in enforcing the law.

See here and here for the previous updates. It obviously would have been better for the Fifth Circuit to have upheld Judge Hittner’s ruling, but it kind of looks to me like they limited enforcement by broadly stating that most drag performances don’t fall under this law. That may be a naive reading, as that still leaves it to Ken Paxton and other prosecutors to interpret what that means and may very well cause performers to reel in what they do whether they needed to or not. Judge Hittner will get this back in his court, and perhaps his second try at explaining why this is unconstitutional will stick. The main thing is that drag performers and the venues that host them are now in some unquantifiable amount of jeopardy, where before they were not. That is absolutely a bad thing.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Ismaili Center has its opening

I’m really looking forward to seeing it for myself.

Courtesy Abbas Yasin, Assad Yasin and Abizer Yasin

After nearly two decades of planning and construction, a vacant property near Buffalo Bayou has been transformed into a majestic, 150,000-square-foot Ismaili Center — a new cultural and religious landmark that is the first of its kind in the United States.

While the Ismaili Center, Houston will serve as a prayer venue, its representatives hope locals also embrace it as a peer to the likes of the Menil Collection, Rothko Chapel, Asia Society Texas, and the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. The center plans to host art exhibitions, lectures and music recitals.

The center opened its doors Thursday morning in a grand ceremony, welcoming 500 guests and civic leaders.

“We’re here to recognize the Ismaili community’s greatness, and in doing so, we get to show the greatness of the city of Houston,” Mayor John Whitmire told the audience in a speech that praised the city’s diversity.

“This is a historic event,” Whitmire added. “Pause a moment and realize what we’re experiencing, what we’re witnessing.”

[…]

On Thursday, Aga Khan V ushered in his father’s dream with an official dedication ceremony at the center located on Allen Parkway and Montrose Boulevard. It’s the seventh Ismaili center in the world, and the first to be built in the U.S.

The event marked the Ismaili Center’s soft opening, with full public access beginning in December.

As the ceremony unfolded Thursday morning, dignitaries sat in silence and watched a live video feed of Aga Khan V’s motorcade arriving to the center’s well-manicured grounds. An announcer asked attendees to rise as the spiritual leader walked into an event center with Whitmire.

After the mayor’s speech, Aga Khan V addressed the crowd and said the mayor was “a tough act to follow.”

“I’ll start by saying that Houston is the friendliest city I’ve ever visited,” Aga Khan V said, sparking applause and laughter.

He said Houston was a “natural choice” for the first Ismaili center in the U.S. — the city is home to a significant number of Ismailis, he said, and Houston offers “friendship to people from all over the world.”

“This building may be called an Ismaili Center, but it is not here for Ismailis only,” he said. “It is for all Houstonians to use, a place open to all who seek knowledge, reflection and dialogue.”

See here for the previous entry. That’s a gift link, and there’s a ton of pictures to go along with this long story, so check it all out. I look forward to seeing what’s on their calendar and making a trip over there to see it all for myself. I drove past the empty lot and then the construction for many years, so there’s a lot of anticipation. Congrats to them for bringing this vision to its completion.

Posted in Elsewhere in Houston | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A bit more election miscellany

Pondering the County Attorney situation.

Despite technically resigning, [Harris County Attorney Christian] Menefee has remained the acting county attorney throughout the campaign period. It’s not clear if he will remain in the position as he prepares to campaign for a runoff election. Harris County commissioners briefly discussed the issue during executive session at a special meeting Tuesday, but did not take any action.

Menefee declared his candidacy for Texas’ 18th Congressional District March 14, triggering a provision in the Texas Constitution that requires certain elected officials resign from their positions upon announcing their intent to run for another. But Commissioners Court has not designated a successor, meaning Menefee will remain as the “holdover” county attorney until one is chosen.

I’ve been wondering about this, too. There was a scenario in the special election – unlikely, but not impossible – in which Menefee didn’t qualify for the runoff and then declared he was no longer running for CD18 and would not file for it in the primary. Would he till have to resign as County Attorney? Probably, but I have no idea if a situation like that had ever happened before. And as long as we’re engaging in hypotheticals, what would stop Commissioners Court from appointing him as his own replacement? My guess would be “someone would immediately sue and the courts would not be having it”, but again I’d bet this has never happened before and so who knows.

As Campos notes, both Menefee and Amanda Edwards will have to file for the March primary, in which Rep. Al Green will also be an opponent, without knowing whether they will be effectively running as the incumbent or as the disappointed loser of the special election. They may not know that until early voting for the primary is almost upon us. Whatever happens there, I would venture to guess that Menefee filing for CD18 in the primary will spur Commissioners Court to name an actual replacement County Attorney. Even in the ridiculous scenario where Menefee himself was the appointed replacement, County Attorney will be on the ballot in 2026, to fill out the remainder of Menefee’s term. Commissioners Court will have to name a replacement if only to settle the question of whether they’re picking a caretaker who won’t run in 2026 or not.

Rice poli-sci prof Mark Jones brings up my favorite hobby horse in an op-ed about Dem enthusiasm and turnout.

The Nov. 4 election revealed a substantial enthusiasm gap among Democratic and Republican voters coast to coast as well as here in Houston. We are a year away from the 2026 midterms, but these results, combined with public opinion polls that show declining public approval of President Donald Trump and Republicans in general, should be setting off warning bells in Republican campaign headquarters across the country. Locally, these results may cause some high-profile Democrats to take a second look at the newly redrawn 9th Congressional District. While Trump won the new TX-9 by 20 points in 2024, Republican Sen. Ted Cruz lost the district by 1% in 2018. Last night’s results suggest that if current trends continue, the 2026 election is likely to look more like 2018 than 2024, which would in theory put TX-9 into play for Houston Democrats.

As noted before by me. I will also refer you to that Nate Cohn piece about Trump 2024 voters flipping to Dems. The good news is that we now have a decent candidate in CD09. See also Daily Kos for more on this.

LOL.

The California Republican Party is asking a federal court to stop California’s new Congressional maps from taking effect.

The party and their attorneys sued California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Gov. Gavin Newsom a day after voters approved the Democratic-drawn maps in a measure known as Proposition 50. The maps are in effect for the next three elections. Republicans argue the new maps violate the Voting Rights Act by favoring Latino and Hispanic voters.

Proposition 50 tossed the state’s U.S. House District maps drawn by the state’s citizen-led independent redistricting commission and replaced it with new maps that were quickly drawn by Democrats and their consultants. The maps attempt to remove up to five Republicans from California’s representation in Congress.

Mike Columbo, an attorney who filed the lawsuit, pointed to various statements made by map drawer Paul Mitchell and Democratic legislative leaders in California, who said the maps give Latinos more voting power that other groups.

The party Wednesday filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

[…]

Asked for a comment on the lawsuit, a spokesperson for Newsom’s office said it hadn’t reviewed it yet, but said in part, “Good luck, losers.”

Via Michael Li, and you can see the complaint in a reply tweet. I have nothing to add to this.

And speaking of losers:

Gov. Greg Abbott and his most prominent Democratic challenger, state Rep. Gina Hinojosa, quickly sought to frame Tuesday’s election results in New York City and other states a sign of what’s at stake for the governor’s race in Texas next year.

Abbott, a Republican seeking a record fourth term in office, posted numerous times about Zohran Mamdani’s victory in the New York City mayoral race.

The governor offered “thoughts & prayers” for New York in a post on X Tuesday night. On Wednesday, he wrote that the Democratic socialist’s win makes Texas the “unrivaled HQ for capitalism in the U.S.”

“The battle lines between capitalism and socialism were clearly drawn last night,” Abbott wrote. “We will secure capitalism for the future of our country and deny the expansion of socialism that is creeping across the US.”

The governor notably did not mention California’s election, in which voters approved a new congressional map meant to counter the new Texas map Abbott signed into law earlier this year.

Hinojosa, meanwhile, responded to the governor’s “thoughts & prayers” post: “Wouldn’t it be nice if Texas had a governor who was focused on the things *Texans need* instead of…….whatever this is.”

You could probably charge Mamdani enough rent for all the space he’s taking up in your head to pay for that private school voucher scam, Greg.

Posted in Election 2025, Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Terry Virts to run in CD09

All right.

Terry Virts

Terry Virts, the former Air Force pilot and retired astronaut, ended his bid Thursday for the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate and announced that he would enter the race for a newly drawn congressional district in the Houston area.

A first-time candidate, Virts had been something of an odd-man-out in the Democratic Senate field that also features state Rep. James Talarico of Austin and former U.S. Rep. Colin Allred of Dallas. Allred was the Democrats’ 2024 nominee in the race against U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz and Talarico has drawn national attention after appearing on influencer Joe Rogan’s popular podcast over the summer.

Congressional District 9 was redrawn by the Republican-led Legislature in August from a Democratic stronghold represented for 20 years by U.S. Rep. Al Green into one that appears to give the GOP a built-in 60-40 edge. State Rep. Briscoe Cain, a four-term lawmaker from Deer Park, and Alexandra del Moral Mealer, who narrowly lost the 2022 race for Harris County judge, are battling for the Republican nomination for Congressional District 9.

In a news release announcing his change of plans, the 57-year-old Virts said he is undaunted about running as a Democrat in what appears to be GOP territory.

“When politicians changed the political maps to favor their power over the power of the people, the maps changed but my mission didn’t,” said Virts, a graduate of the Air Force Academy “I’m running to make sure Texans voices are heard fighting for Texas families, small businesses and the American dream. This campaign is about service, leadership and results — not politics.”

Virts was one of the first people to say he was interested in running for the Senate, then was the first to officially announce his candidacy. He was overshadowed by Colin Allred and then James Talarico, but he still managed to raise some money along the way, which he will need for this campaign.

I’ve been clamoring for a real candidate in CD09 for awhile now, so this makes me happy. I don’t know how he’ll do on the trail, but if nothing else he should have a charisma advantage over the two whiny twerps on the Republican side. And as we’ve discussed, the 2024 electoral numbers for districts like this one are written on sand. This should be viewed as a swing seat. Let’s do this. Here’s his intro video for this campaign:

#TX09 deserves better representation.

While Congress plays games with gerrymandering, everyday Texans continue to work hard to put food on the table.

We are fed up with the politics. Enough is enough.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=UUV8…

[image or embed]

— Terry Virts (@astroterry.bsky.social) November 6, 2025 at 9:35 AM

I approve this message, too.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Who wants to Save College Sports?

If you’ve watched any college football this year, you’ve seen some version of this ad, probably a million times:

I have wondered on more than one occasion what this is all about and whether I should in fact support this effort. But when I’m watching sports I’m generally not engaging my blogging brain, so I’ve never followed up on that urge.

And then, this week’s Hang Up and Listen told me what I needed to know. It’s the second segment, about 28 minutes in, if you want to listen. This USA Today profile of Cody Campbell, the Texas billionaire and Texas Tech booster who’s behind their massive NIL investments and the ads you see, has a brief explainer.

What, exactly, does Campbell want to see change?

For one, he believes the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act, which is being fast-tracked in the U.S. House of Representatives, is too narrow in scope. He thinks the legislation inadequately addresses issues facing women’s sports and non-revenue sports, as well as problems plaguing smaller schools as they try to compete with their larger, richer counterparts.

In a column he penned for USA TODAY on Monday, Sept. 15, Campbell argued there needs to be a new governing body in college sports that replaces the NCAA, which he writes has “fought tooth and nail against any rule that would benefit student-athletes and protect the most vulnerable schools and sports.”

“The NCAA’s version of the SCORE Act ensures that the powerful colleges stay powerful and relegates the lesser-advantaged schools to permanent irrelevance,” he wrote. “The SCORE Act also does not address the fact that there will not be enough money to pay for sports, like track, swimming, volleyball, soccer and softball. Through sneaky and strategic drafting, the SCORE Act does not explicitly grant the NCAA direct power, but the implications are clear — they will regain control if this bill becomes law.”

Campbell’s primary and oft-repeated solution to many of the challenges facing college sports is amending the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961.

For many, including millions of fans tuning into games and seeing Campbell on their screens, it’s a relatively obscure piece of legislation.

The law, which was passed in response to a series of antitrust cases against the NFL, gives professional sports leagues an antitrust exemption to pool together their media rights and sell them as part of a single package rather than each team or division having its own deals.

In Campbell’s view, the Power Four conferences can get together and have a single media-rights deal rather than each league having its own contracts with television networks. Those conferences earn a projected $3 billion annually from their media rights and one industry person told [USA Today Sports’ Matt] Hayes that figure could double if the four conferences had a single deal.

Still, there are significant obstacles to Campbell’s dream becoming a reality.

For one, amending the Sports Broadcasting Act would run counter to the Supreme Court’s landmark 1984 decision in NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, which ruled that the NCAA had an illegal monopoly over television rights. That ruling allowed schools and conferences to seek their own media-rights deals, a system that’s largely still in place today.

There’s also the challenge of getting the Big Ten and SEC, the most powerful conferences with the most opulent media-rights deals, to agree to come together with the ACC and Big 12 under a single contractual umbrella when they’re so obviously advantaged in the current structure.

“Why would we share revenue when we have the product that bears the fruit, and others don’t?” an unidentified SEC official said to [USA Today Sports’ Matt] Hayes.

You should read that op-ed Campbell wrote to get more of the big picture. A bit more on the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 is here, written by Matt Brown, who was the guest on that Hang Up segment that explained this all to me. An opposing view on Campbell and his professed solution is in this Matt Florio column, which was a response to the ads and not to the op-ed.

The SCORE Act that Campbell opposes is not going anywhere right now, obviously. Campbell’s preferred bill is the Democratic-sponsored SAFE act. The Texas Lawbook has a nice overview of both bills.

Introduced by Democratic Senators Maria Cantwell, Cory Booker and Richard Blumenthal and supported by professional athlete associations, the SAFE Act takes an athlete-centric approach to establishing federal standards. It guarantees athletic scholarships for 10 years and medical coverage for five years after their eligibility expires. It caps agent compensation at 5 percent of NIL deals. And it authorizes the Federal Trade Commission and states attorneys general to exercise oversight.

As important is the SAFE Act’s silence on two critical issues. First, it does not exempt the NCAA from antitrust laws, preserving the primary tool used by athletes to challenge what some consider to be oppressive NCAA rules. Plaintiffs in the recent O’Bannon, Alston and House cases each used federal antitrust laws to secure critical athlete benefits, including the ability to receive NIL and revenue sharing income. Second, the SAFE Act is quiet on whether athletes qualify as employees, leaving the door open for future litigation and potential collective bargaining.

Two SAFE Act provisions particularly align with Campbell’s advocacy. Most notably, the SAFE Act enacts the Sports Broadcasting Act amendment Campbell has pushed, allowing the NCAA to once again bundle broadcast rights as opposed to the current mosaic of conference broadcasting deals. The move is expected to increase total revenue, with the surplus earmarked towards Campbell’s other cause: protection of Olympic and women’s sports.

[…]

The Republican-sponsored Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements Act takes an opposite approach. Despite clamor for federal standards, the SCORE Act largely cedes full authority to the same institution that oversaw the current predicament: the NCAA.

The SCORE Act affords the NCAA the same ability to establish standards that the organization possesses today, ranging from restrictions on transfers to caps on agent compensation. It allows the NCAA to determine an appropriate percentage of revenue to be shared with athletes and whether that percentage should be modified in the future. And it leaves oversight of the industry to the NCAA, zeroing out a role for federal or state regulators.

Instead, the SCORE Act pronounces where the SAFE Act stays silent, granting the NCAA the two exemptions it has long sought. It largely exempts the NCAA from antitrust liability, insulating NCAA decisions related to compensation, eligibility, and transfer restrictions. And it prohibits athletes from being recognized as employees, codifying the “student-athlete” moniker the NCAA has long pushed (and at least one Supreme Court justice has admonished).

Unsurprisingly, the SCORE Act has the backing of the NCAA. In a recent letter, 31 of the 32 college athletic conference commissioners (Ivy League Executive Director Robin Harris being the sole holdout) advocated for the bill. NCAA President Charlie Baker has also expressed his approval.

So now you know. Campbell is now busy fighting with conference commissioners over the two bills, and having an ad accusing them of being greedy get rejected by Fox and ABC. The NYT and the Chron recently had profiles on Campbell if after all this you still want to know more.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tuesday was a good day for school boards

I refer you once again to Franklin Strong and his much-valued Book-Loving Texans’ Guide to the school board elections. There weren’t that many school board races on the ballot in November – May is a more common month for these races – but there were some clear and obvious opportunities for improvement. Let’s check in on them.

We’ve already noted the clean sweep in Cy-Fair ISD, which should go a long way towards restoring some sanity in that district. Remember when Greg Abbott came to town to rally for those candidates, amid promises to “turn Harris County dark red” next year? Good job, good effort. You can smell the desperation.

Two of the three HISD candidates from the BLTG won, with the incumbent who in my view most needed to get the boot getting it. There was a third Harris County district on the list, Klein ISD, and there the two Moms for Liberty extremists lost by wide margins. As Franklin Strong notes in his writeup, it remains to be seen how good, or at least how effective in that district the two winners will be. But keeping extremists out of power is always a good first step.

In Granbury ISD, in deep red Hood County, the three bad candidates all lost. I couldn’t find a story about that election, but you can see the results here (scroll down), and know that the winners are better than the losers.

In Lake Worth ISD, a district that is on the cusp of TEA takeover, the one bad candidate identified by the BLTG lost his race to the sister-in-law of an incumbent who was re-elected.

Princeton ISD and College Station ISD were mixed bags, with one good candidate and one bad candidate winning the two At Large spots in Princeton ISD (in Collin County), and one good candidate winning while another one lost in College Station ISD. The candidate who won over the good candidate in College Station ISD wasn’t one of the bad candidates, he just wasn’t the recommended one in that race.

So overall, pretty good. Strong is already working on the BLTG for May 2026, where there will surely be more opportunities to make things better. Congrats to all the winners. Bay Area Houston has more.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Finally, a real story about Taylor Rehmet

Amazing what a little overperforming versus expectations can do.

Taylor Rehmet

For months, the special election to succeed Acting Comptroller Kelly Hancock in a red-leaning North Texas Senate seat revolved around the two Republicans in the race.

But once the early voting and Election Day ballots were all counted on Tuesday, it was Democrat Taylor Rehmet who raked in the most votes out of all three candidates, coming within three percentage points — fewer than 3,000 votes — of a stunning outright win. He led with 47.6% of votes over conservative activist Leigh Wambsganss’ 36% and former Republican Southlake Mayor John Huffman’s 16%.

It was a remarkable finish for a Democrat running in a Tarrant County-based district that voted for President Donald Trump by more than 17 points last year, and who spent just $68,000 compared to the millions deployed by each of his GOP opponents.

Because nobody won a majority of the votes, Rehmet and Wambsganss will face off in a runoff election, likely in January. Despite coming out of Tuesday on top, Rehmet remains an underdog in the overtime contest, with his nearly 48% support in the first round outweighed by the combined GOP vote for his opponents.

Still, Rehmet’s surprise near-win — and Democratic victories around the country — seemed to offer hope for a beleaguered Texas Democratic Party going into 2026 desperate to reverse course after getting blown out in virtually every statewide race since Trump’s first midterm cycle eight years ago. Some in the party saw Tuesday’s surge as evidence that Democratic turnout and backlash to the Trump administration next year could resemble the blue wave that swept through the nation in 2018 and made Democrats competitive statewide in Texas.

Matthew Wilson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University, said Rehmet’s overperformance was driven by voters angry with the Trump administration and the broader state of the country.

“The fact that Rehmet did as well as he did speaks to the level of energized anti-Trump sentiment in the Democratic base, and the fact that Republicans going into the midterms have a real turnout and enthusiasm gap that they are going to have to address, or else they’re going to see some surprising and painful losses,” Wilson said.

GOP strategists acknowledged that backlash to the Trump administration and energized Democratic voters could threaten Republicans next year, but warned against drawing conclusions from the Senate District 9 results and other off-year contests.

“I really think it turns on the economy,” Vinny Minchillo, a Plano-based Republican strategist, said. “I hate to read too much into anything like this.”

Rehmet, a union leader, machinist and Air Force veteran, largely stood to the side as his Republican opponents battled each other for the GOP vote. He spent less than half of the $150,000 he raised over the course of his campaign in one of the country’s most expensive media markets. Yet he ran several points ahead of the district’s Democratic nominee in 2022 and Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024, both of whom received about 40% from voters in Senate District 9.

Wambsganss, meanwhile, spent around $1.4 million on her campaign, while Huffman’s bid was largely financed by casino magnate Miriam Adelson and her Las Vegas Sands empire, whose PACs spent some $3.5 million donating to Huffman’s campaign and paying for advertising on his behalf.

“For them to spend several million dollars and for Republican turnout to not be higher and more favorable for the Republicans combined is a pretty good sign in the short term,” said Katherine Fischer, director of Texas Majority PAC, which supported Rehmet’s campaign.

In the long term, Fischer said it was difficult to forecast what Tuesday’s results mean for future contests.

Still, she said that “there’s just no doubt that all election results since November indicate that voters are extremely frustrated with the Trump administration and are punishing Republicans for it.” She noted that Rehmet captured 44% of early votes — even though only 35% of early voters in the race were tagged as likely Democrats.

I covered Rehmet’s overperformance relative to other Democrats in my Wednesday writeup. I have little doubt that Rehmet benefitted from some Democratic enthusiasm relative to Republicans, and as I said he remains an underdog for the runoff. I do hope that this result will get him some attention and support from the broader Democratic community – again, with the acknowledgement that raising his profile and the profile of this race may lead to more Republican engagement as well. I will be checking his next finance report closely, for sure. As Katherine Fischer says later in the article, “If we don’t at least try to win, we would be doing everyone a serious disservice”.

I also want to flag another possibility here, which come via Nate Cohn:

In the Trump era, Democrats have seemed to excel among the highly engaged, highly educated voters who predominate in low-turnout, off-year elections, only to struggle when more irregular and less educated voters flock to the polls in presidential years.

But on Tuesday, when Democrats won the Virginia and New Jersey governor’s races by wide margins, it wasn’t simply because more Democratic-leaning voters showed up to the polls while more Republican-leaning voters sat out. The Democratic candidates also succeeded at winning over a modest but meaningful sliver of President Trump’s supporters, based on exit polls and authoritative voter file records.

[…]

The gold standard for analyzing the electorate is the individual-level records of who voted in an election (but not whom they voted for).

Usually, this data takes months to become available. But New Jersey, nine counties containing nearly half of the state’s electorate have already provided this data for both early and Election Day voters, allowing an unusually early and authoritative look at who cast ballots in 2025 — and their party registrations.

In these counties, Democrats had a roughly 19-point turnout edge by party registration, up from around a 16-point edge among 2024 voters. That’s a net 2.5-point shift (the figures are rounded), and largely consistent with what the exit polls found.

Alone, the net 2.5-point shift in party registration would not explain a nearly nine-point shift toward Ms. Sherrill in these counties (when compared with the 2024 vote for Ms. Harris). More sophisticated modeling, using Times/Siena poll data, shows a similar if slightly more pronounced pattern, with Ms. Sherrill gaining a net 3.5 points because of turnout alone — still not enough to account for her much bigger gains overall.

In other words, the voter records suggest the same thing the exit polls do: Ms. Sherrill benefited from Democrats’ improved turnout, but she benefited even more from flipping some of Mr. Trump’s 2024 supporters to her side.

We don’t have party registration (modulo the recent RPT litigation) but we do know what primaries voters have participated in, and every campaign has models to say who is a likely supporter of themselves or their opponents. If Rehmet got 44% of the early vote from an electorate that they had tagged as about 35% Democratic, then it stands to reason that some of those voters were not Democrats. If some number of people who are not thought of as Democrats are now voting for Democrats, that would seem to portend good things for Democrats, would it not?

I’ve said this a million times in the past and I’m going to say it again: You can’t tell the story of what happened in 2018 in Texas without acknowledging that a lot of people who had been voting Republican in the past voted for Democrats up and down the ballot that year. This is how HD134, a high-turnout mostly white district that voted 56% for Mitt Romney in 2012 then went on to vote 60% for Beto in 2018. That’s not turnout, that’s people voting differently. The same was true for CD07, which at the time was also a high-turnout mostly white district, which included nearly all of HD134.

I don’t know what will happen in this runoff, or more broadly in 2026. I do know that we already have a lot of evidence, even before Tuesday, that a lot of Trump’s surge in Latino support from 2024 is fading significantly. (From that same NYT piece: “The exit polls in New Jersey found that Ms. Sherrill won a whopping 18 percent of Mr. Trump’s Hispanic support in the state”.) That’s sure to have some effect, in SD09 and on the redistricted Congressional map and in the state overall. How much remains to be seen. I think it’s more likely to continue on a path in Dems’ favor between now and next November than it is to retreat, but again we’ll see. Maybe this SD09 runoff will give us some additional evidence. So yeah, we better be trying our best to win it. Daily Kos has more.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HPD king of overtime reassigned

Fascinating.

A Houston police officer who racked up more than $170,000 in overtime writing tickets in 2024 has been transferred out of the traffic division, the Chronicle has learned through an open records request.

Around a week after testifying in court about a jaywalking ticket he wrote, Officer Matthew Davis was transferred to the patrol division after an eight-year stint as a traffic officer, the records show.

Officials with the Houston Police Department declined to comment about Davis’ transfer and he couldn’t be reached for comment. The Chronicle requested the reason for the transfer, but the agency didn’t provide it.

An August Chronicle investigation found Davis collected more in overtime than his base salary every year since at least 2020, and was previously disciplined for participating in an overtime scheme involving fabricated witness claims on traffic tickets.

“He doesn’t belong on traffic, because he was abusing the system in my opinion,” said Anthony Osso, a high-profile defense attorney who represented Daragh John Carter in court over the jaywalking ticket. “He stopped my client for exercising his First Amendment rights.”

[…]

Davis has twice been disciplined for fraudulent overtime practices, including once in 2012 for a scheme with three other officers to use ticket writing to draw more overtime money.

Davis received a 30-day suspension in 2012 after investigators determined he participated in an overtime scheme with three other officers, in which they falsely cited each other as witnesses on tickets so they’d get called into court more frequently.

The four veteran officers collected nearly $1 million in combined overtime pay through the scheme between 2008 and 2012, according to a Chronicle article from September 2012.

Then, in 2013, department leaders handed down a 15-day suspension (later reduced to a five-day suspension on appeal) after allegations that Davis had been working a second job at the same time he was claiming overtime for his job as a police officer, according to his personnel file.

See here for more on abuse of overtime, and here for more on that weird jaywalking case. I’m glad something happened as a result of that story on HPD’s massive overtime budget. This is what I’m talking about when I say that if we really want efficiency and less “waste” in our city’s budget, we really need to apply the same tactics and techniques for identifying and eliminating said waste to the single biggest part of the budget, the public safety part of it. Unless we don’t actually want that, in which case we can keep on doing what we’re doing.

Also, too, how many times does this guy, or anyone like him, have to be disciplined for committing fraud against his employer before they fire him? I know it’s not that simple, this is all addressed in the collective bargaining agreement between the city and HPD. And hey, as someone who considers himself pro-labor, I don’t as a rule want to make it easier for employers to fire people. But you’ve got to draw a line somewhere.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

More on the November election

Here’s a Chron story from the weekend that annoyed me a little.

Early voting in Harris County wrapped up Friday with some of the lowest voting turnouts in recent years for Texas’ most populous county. but still higher than in past non-mayoral elections.
According to unofficial totals from the Harris County Clerk’s Office, about 212,000 votes were cast during early voting, including 204,993 in-person votes and 7,111 mail-in ballots. That means almost 8% of the county’s 2.7 million registered voters participated early.

The figure is lower than the Nov. 7, 2023, election, the last non-presidential cycle, when roughly 233,000 residents voted early. It also marks a sharp decline from the 1.1 million who cast ballots early in last year’s presidential election.

This year’s election features a mix of municipal and special district contests, but no major statewide or national races. The most prominent contest on Harris County ballots is the special election to fill Rep. Sylvester Turner’s former seat in Texas’ 18th Congressional District. Voters within Houston city limits are also deciding the At-Large Position 4 City Council seat, vacated earlier this year by Letitia Plummer, who is running for county judge.

Mark Jones, a political scientist with Rice University, said the lack of a mayoral or city-wide race explains much of this year’s slower turnout.

“The principal reason is that we don’t have a City of Houston election on the ballot this year,” Jones said. “We also don’t have controversial propositions on the ballot like in San Antonio that would help build the new Spurs arena, or the proposition in Austin that would increase property taxes.”

Jones said the county is on pace to end up between a 12-14% turnout once Election Day votes are added, which is a higher turnout than 2017 and 2021, which each drew less than 10% turnout.

“That’s not great turnout overall, but it’s solid by comparison to the most recent non-mayor election years,” Jones said.

Actually, turnout for Harris County was 16.55%, which in context is significantly above Prof. Jones’ estimate. About half of the vote being cast on Election Day, which is more or less in line with most odd-numbered years; 2023 was an exception to that. I suspect Jones underestimated E-Day turnout.

But we did have a city of Houston election on the ballot – it was a special election, but it still counts – and we had the CD18 election, with quite a bit of money being spent in it. Both of those will drive turnout. Here’s how that broke down:

CD18 – 77,415 ballots cast out of 414,806 registered voters, for 18.66% turnout
Harris County overall – 440,570 ballots cast out of 2,662,659 registered voters, for 16.55% turnout
Harris County minus CD18 – 363,155 ballots cast out of 2,247,853 registered voters, for 16.16% turnout

City of Houston – 214,114 ballots cast out of 1,186,586 registered voters, for 18.04% turnout
Harris County minus Houston – 226,456 ballots cast out of 1,476,073 registered voters, for 15.34% turnout

Where the races were is where the action was. And in the end, that led to this year being quite the outlier for years in which there isn’t a regular city of Houston election scheduled. Here’s how that looks:


Year    Harris   Houston  NotHouston
====================================
2025    16.55%    18.04%      15.34%
2023    17.47%    21.66%      14.00%
2021     9.22%
2019    16.22%    22.56%      11.62%
2017     6.72%     9.49%       4.35%
2015    20.51%    27.45%      14.19%

“NotHouston” is Harris County minus Houston, and that’s how I calculated that percentage. I only have the Harris County number for 2021 because there was nothing citywide that year – there were bond initiatives in 2017 – but it’s reasonable to assume that the Houston turnout rate that year would be about the same as the overall rate. Thanks to the CD18 and At Large #4 elections, 2025 was more like a Mayoral year than it was like 2021 or 2017. I don’t know why NotHouston turnout was higher this year than in other years, but let’s make a note of that for the future.

Anyway. I’m not that annoyed with the story. I just like to make sure all the angles are considered when we talk about turnout.

Here are a few notes based on the press releases I got on Wednesday:

– Jolanda Jones will run for re-election in HD147 and not in the primary for CD18. That primary is almost certainly going to include Al Green, and the campaign for it will start well before the runoff for the special election happens. There’s been reporting about confusion among voters who are currently in CD18, and while it’s clear to me what’s happening, it is a mess and easy to see why people are mixed up. The overlapping special election/primary campaigns won’t help, and neither will the fact that both Menefee and Edwards will have to file for the primary without knowing what their status will be.

– On a side note, we’re going to have a contested primary in CD29, as former State Rep. Jarvis Johnson plans to challenge Rep. Sylvia Garcia. Former CD18 candidate Robert Slater is also planning to run in CD29. This doesn’t have anything to do with the November results, but that tab had been open on my desktop for too long, and it is another indicator of how messy the next primary will be. Which is 100% one of the things the Republicans intended when they did the redistricting. See Campos for more.

– Texas Victory Consulting took a victory lap to celebrate their poll of CD18, which correctly predicted the order of the top candidates, and also pegged the level of support for Republican Carmen Montiel and independent George Foreman. The last UH/Hobby poll was also pretty accurate.

– The Lone Star Project touted the performance of Taylor Rehmet in SD09.

Tarrant County voters sent a strong and, for some, unexpected message by giving Taylor Rehmet nearly 48 percent of the vote in the special election in State Senate District 9, considered by most to be safely Republican.

Rehmet ran first in a multi-candidate field and more than 10 points ahead of the second-place finisher, hand-picked MAGA activist Leigh Wambsganss. Rehmet got 47.6 percent of the vote compared to Wambsganss’ 36 percent, and Rehmet was less than 3,000 votes away from an outright majority.

Among those not surprised by the strong showing were Taylor Rehmet and his army of supporters that include Democrats, Independents, and some clear-eyed Republicans. From day one, Taylor focused on the core issues important to Tarrant County voters – low taxes, good jobs, good schools, and driving utility and other prices down.

Rehmet’s message contrasts sharply with Wambsganss who works as a MAGA mouthpiece for Patriot Mobile, a cellular service company that skims revenue to back ideologically extreme candidates and causes.

Wambsganss’ second place finish ahead of the more traditional Republican candidate, John Huffman, is further confirmation that the Republican Party in Tarrant is now entirely dominated by the most extreme MAGA elements in our culture.

Make no mistake, Texas Senate District 9 was drawn to be a safe district for Republicans, but no district can be expected to back candidates whose only qualification is expertise in fomenting hate and pitting Texans against each other.

Taylor Rehmet is giving District 9 voters a chance to be represented by someone who brings a clear-eyed and fair-minded point of view to public service. Wambsganss is promising more hateful division and mindless devotion to ideologue leaders in Austin and Washington.

Here’s the Star-Telegram story on this race. I don’t know what to expect for the runoff, but this race deserves more attention. I recognize that may have the effect of boosting Republican turnout – for sure, the GOP will not want to lose this seat, even if that doesn’t mean much in terms of controlling that chamber. It would just be hugely embarrassing to them. Which I certainly favor.

Finally, one more result of interest that I didn’t mention before:

Residents in a rural North Texas community have voted not to become the state’s newest small city as supporters attempted to regulate a nearby Bitcoin mine.

Unofficial results show voters in Mitchell Bend, a small community south of Granbury, voted overwhelmingly not to become a Type B municipality.

Supporters had been campaigning for months in an effort to regulate the Bitcoin operation, owned by MARA Holdings, within its boundaries. They say the mine makes a constant humming noise that has caused health issues including lack of sleep, nausea and vertigo.

Cheryl Shadden, who runs the Facebook page Bitcoin Noise Hood County, lives directly across the street from the Bitcoin mine. She said she’s suffered from hearing loss and the noise has also impacted her livestock.

“We’re not against big industry,” Shadden told KERA ahead of the election. “What we’re against is harming the community.”

Shadden and other residents have said that incorporating as a city was one of the only ways they could effectively take action against the noise pollution.

“What we want to do is get back and preserve the peace we had, it’s that simple,” said Tom Weeks, who lives in a neighborhood behind the mine.

The Trib had a preview of this election as well as a story about the election result. I feel for the people affected by the noise. I would suggest they start pestering their legislators about this as well. Josh Marshall has more on the national perspective, and The Barbed Wire covers the constitutional amendments. I’ll have more tomorrow on the school board races.

Posted in Election 2025 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments